Monthly Archives: July 2019

what the Left hate & fear

Posted on by
Reply

1. One can learn something even from the enemy’s lies & obfuscation. For example, after Trump’s monumental tweet against the AOCs and Ilhan Omars:

he was roundly attacked as a vile racist, for the gorillionth time this month. He is clearly just a civnat, or at least he acts as one – I suspect he browses /pol as do I upon wakening, and is aware of genetic trends in IQ and crime; but he’s too much a believer in the American Myth to start gassing anyone. He strikes me as a man perfectly capable of focussed nastiness against those who betray him, but ultimately quite amiable and a believer in the capitalist ideal, that all groups can cooperate for their mutual benefit.

I am an ethno-nationalist, in that I think genetics are the bedrock from which a working culture (whether nation, or something smaller like a tribe) is established. Civic nationalists are colour blind idealists who think America is a proposition nation, that genetics don’t matter as long as you say you accept the tenets of acceptable behaviour & belief. I find them naive and a little ridiculous but also half-wish their vision were more than a pipe dream.

2. But why do the Left hate the civnats so intensely? After all, a civnat like Styxhexenhammer merely thinks Americans should subscribe to certain cultural values, which I would regard more as the absence of true values: the NAP (Non-Aggression-Principle) etc., and yet he is accused of being a Nazi, far Right, and so on and so on. It’s a little comical, talking to Lefties or even normies: they regard a moderate civic nationalist as literally Hitler. So, at a deeply cucked conference, The Z Man:

Everyone I spoke with at the event talked about themselves as if they were dissidents, dodging the search lights of the man. It’s really weird hearing people talk about how dangerous it is to be a civic nationalist.

I think one reason for the Left’s hate, apart from their inherent hatred, hatred as their founding principle & motive force, is that they have their own agenda – white genocide, Communism (or any totalitarian government), Islam as the only acceptable religion – and even the civnats stand in their way, since the civnats would say “hold on, I don’t care if a genetic group perishes, though obviously I would if pandas or Bengal tigers went extinct, but Communism? Communism?” So sooner or later, the Left would have to deal with the civnats.

3. Another reason: the Left have generally operated through stealth & deceit. They pushed the envelope slowly, always accusing the prescient of entertaining “conspiracy theories”, so when Nigel Farage said the EU wanted its own army, back in 2015, the globohomo Nick Clegg called this “a dangerous fantasy”; and then, in 2017, Guy Verhofstadt called for an EU army. Or, decades ago, stuffy old conservatives in tweed said all this gay rights nonsense would end in faggots diddling our children, the multimillionaire journalists and TV stars scoffed, and then in the late Obama years globohomo websites like Salon began to normalise paedophilia with articles like this, and Facebook ran surveys to determine public acceptance of having sex with children:

Or you have police snipers protecting paedophiles (many with a criminal record) as the deviants are unleashed on small children, with of course their left-wing parents’ full permission:

4. The Left, having rejected all forms of morality (though they love to moralise) have no sense of objective truth; thus, they have no compunctions about lying. When someone like Donald Trump says everyone can be an American, providing he or she obeys the laws and subscribes to vacuous American values of tolerance, the Left don’t think “how quaint”; they think “this is just the first step – in twenty years he’ll be gassing us all!” – because that is their own project: to begin with small compromises & concessions, and end with the genocide of the white race and the destruction of Western civilisation. In their hearts, each Leftist knows that each compromise is but the first step on the path to the gulag and genocide; and so they are unable to credit the naivety and good faith of the civnats.

5. Another oddity of the Left – they wish to ban all content to the Right of Nancy Pelosi as racist sexist homophobic liderally Hitler…? Of course, it is simply what any totalitarian group would do, in a position of supremacy. But when they claim some MK Ultra wind-up toy was “radicalised” by Gab or 4Chan, I suspect they reveal something of their own worldview: they believe anything they are told by mainstream media, and so find it incredible that anyone wouldn’t; and so they assume that if you read e.g. 4Chan you must passively absorb and credit everything thereon. They would themselves find a medium like 4Chan intolerably chaotic & decentralized but they probably imagine it as a kind of Nazi propaganda outlet with Goebbels/Trump issuing commands & edicts to the faithful.

6. This is, I think, why the NPC meme was so vigorously censored on Cabal platforms (FB, Twitter, etc.) – because it is true.

I had several such colleagues. One looked literally like a NPC – on every single one of his thousands of Facebook photos he had the same identical grin, with the same identically dead eyes. He could only do his job if it was 100% by the book and regulated; as soon as anything remotely unexpected happened his system crashed and he would simply refuse to try. He spouted NPC talking points from the New York Times and CNN like “birds fly where they want, why can’t humans live wherever they want? Heh heh heh!” and “Drumpf is attacking the freedom of the press! Drumpf is a dictator!”

Another colleague – with a PhD in English Literature – would calmly assure me of things which were demonstrably untrue, e.g. he claimed Sheriff David Clarke “only supported Drumpft because the Russians fooled him” and “he wears fake medals, he claims he was a Navy Seal and he wasn’t even in the military”. I found it astonishing that someone who had spent a good decade writing a doctorate on English Literature would so confidently assert things which even Snopes acknowledges to be untrue. And all of this colleague’s pontifications were delivered in the same swaggering “look at you fucking bozos, I know what’s what, I’m smart, not like you fucking bozos” manner.

The NPC has no interiority. He cannot evaluate, reflect, weigh up the evidence and opinion and come to his own verdict – because there is no “his”; no “him”; no “he”; no inner mind & conscience: just a receptacle for whatever the Cabal media wish to impart. And so, the NPC assumes anyone who reads e.g. a cucksite like Breitbart must be radicalised. It does not occur to the NPC that one can read something and not necessarily believe it. It does not occur to the NPC that someone can support huh huh Orange Hitler Drumpft huh huh huh without being a West Virginia meth addict with an Aryan Brotherhood tattoo.

For the NPC, any divergent opinions must be censored. As in Neal Stephenson’s Snow Crash, unauthorized code will automatically crash the machine. The NPC requires Cabal authorities to provide the daily talking points (“Orange Man Bad!” “Drumpft racist!”) and he contemplates differing opinion as an existential danger, as an infecting code.

Perhaps the value of Trump is thus: he rewrites the code.

why I am not a Capitalist/Communist

Posted on by
Reply

I quote from The Z Man:

Bulldozing a church to build a processing center may be a more efficient use of resources, but conservatives always knew the altar was the keystone of civilization, not the factory.

This is why I am at odds with almost my entire so-called civilisation, whether Communist (everyone should have equal money) or Capitalist (the successful should have the most money). Though, having written that I immediately think, I would personally prefer Capitalism.

Capitalism at least leaves a tiny space for the individual. The old adage, that under Communism the poet is executed by the NKVD, and in Capitalism he starves to death in a garret, has an element of truth but really not so much; for one thing, I have somehow survived firstly on the dole, and then as a minimum-wager, since graduating with the highest possible qualifications from an elite university. I have written literally millions of words since then, self-published one book (which only 3 people bought), am nearly ready to self-publish another (which will presumably be as successful as the last), and while I certainly would have been more productive had the State designated me as an official Writer and then given me carte blanche, or had some middle-aged Jewish cat lady publisher decided to offer me a 5-book contract at Penguin, I am nonetheless alive and I am writing.

I live and write in a kind of crony Capitalism where the biggest names are mostly Cabal-approved, e.g. the almost completely talentless & dead-eyed Cabal puppet

“Britain should have no borders! I own 10 mansions and no, I won’t let Somalis live there! Gandalf was gay! Harry Potter was trans! Brexit is literally Hitler! Refugees welcome! But not in my mansions! They should live with the stupid poor people!” JK Rowling. However, I am under no illusions: even without Cabal, my writings would not be popular enough to pay my rent.

At a personal level, the difference between Capitalism and Communism is that under the latter I would by now have perished in a gulag; under the former I am permitted to do minimum wage labour and to have a blog almost no one reads, and to write books almost no one reads. That is, on a personal level Capitalism is merely indifferent to me, my supposed talents and aptitudes and proclivities, and allows me to survive doing the kind of jobs reserved for the utterly uneducated (most of my colleagues), for ex-criminals (some of my colleagues) and for the grossly over-educated & freakish (me). Under Communism, I would be dead and my books would have had one reader – an apparatchik who would write a report justifying my extinction.

On a societal level, Capitalism horseshoes into Communism: both are utterly materialistic philosophies, deeming one person worse off simply because he makes less money. Well, he is financially worse off, but so what? Why should money be sole criterion for an entire society and worldview? Of course, it is useful, since it is totally quantifiable, but I look forward to a future society where mere finance is relegated to its true significance – perhaps to the level of functioning toilets, something desirable and necessary but by no means the central matter of civilisation.

Thorina and other financial disasters

Posted on by
Reply

No one should be surprised that Marvel are planning to cast a diminutive, dark-haired, dark-eyed, Jewish, Israeli citizen as the new Thor. Oh, and she’s a she.

I’ve been increasingly puzzled by Styxhexenhammer’s assertion that the only reason companies do such stupid things is for money; in his view, everything comes down to money, not ideology. He, for example, asserts that the mainstream media attack Youtubers because they see them as competition.

There probably is a financial component, but in that case the predominantly left-wing media would also, presumably, attack left-wing Youtubers – after all, how many people would go from watching CNN and reading the New York Times to watching an ancap like Stefan Molyneux or an ethnotribalist like Varg Vikernes? Is No White Guilt really competition for the Huffington Post? And why would Disney poz their heroes when it’s clear no one (except SJWs) likes it? Where is the financial sense in casting a small 38-year-old Jewish woman as Thor?

Vox Day is, I think, correct that all of this is part of a concerted, (at least) decades-long attack on Western values of Christianity and masculinity. The enemy wish to humiliate the occupied peoples, much as the Russians forced e.g. the Poles and Hungarians to learn Russian. Every conquering power denigrates the heroes and mythologies of the conquered; the goal is to break the will of the slave class through constant humiliation, through constantly attacking their cultural identity and capacity for resistance. That is part of the Left’s terror & hatred of Trump – he is a partial avatar of everything they’ve been trying to destroy: an unabashed white, straight alpha male.

But regardless of the ideological intent, companies have to make some money; I was thus puzzled at the sheer awfulness of The Last Jedi. You can’t even call it subversive, it’s just badly made, so crassly progressive it wouldn’t subvert but rather repel; it most likely served to Red Pill a few cinema-goers. Did Disney really think there is a market for this? Putting aside that if you work at Disney & Hollywood you probably never meet any normal people, one would think a budget of 200-317 million dollars would have included a bit of initial market research, to determine how many people will pay to have progressive values rammed down their throats. It made money but there seems a delayed effect with such franchises: people go to see it, in spite of a few bad reviews, but then they decide to skip the next one.

When I consider the confidence with which Hollywood executives announce their plans to have e.g. 007 now be a black woman, I wonder if the world works very differently to how I imagined it. It has, at least, prompted some good memes:

I wonder if, in the past, a film could make money regardless of audience, regardless of how few tickets it sold. Anonymous Conservative has speculated, based on some mysterious tweets of James Comey’s (standing in a forest with a text “so many questions”) if Cabal usually communicated indirectly with its puppets; so instead of a centralized hierarchy with clear lines of communication & command, higher puppets like Comey would be told “here’s the deal, do what we want and you will prosper” and then his “instructions” would come in a very indirect, oblique form, not vulnerable to codebreaking but rather, e.g. the New York Times and Washington Post both run articles about how wonderful some new perversity is, and the puppet realises “Cabal want me to push this perversity”; the puppet does accordingly, and is rewarded.

If so, it would explain the school of fish nature of Cabal puppets; there is often some slight variance, swiftly corrected, e.g.  David Lynch said something half-nice about Trump and was immediately rebuked and bowed his head to the progressive agenda. The Cabal puppets don’t get information meetings and performance evaluations: they are mostly left to their own devices but with many information streams by which to judge the will of their masters, and if they deviate they end up on one of those “Why Hollywood won’t cast____again” lists.

When I consider the utter confidence with which the studios announce Thor will now be a small Jewish woman, 007 a negress, I wonder if they feel sure they will be rewarded, whether or not people buy any tickets. As with certain worthless books which become bestsellers, the authors millionaires, but you never meet anyone who’s actually read it, never read a normal, grassroots review on the internet, the reason some businesses thrive and others fail may have little to do with profit & loss. It will be interesting, as Q et al. seem to be systematically cutting the strings of Cabal finance, to see how black Bond and Jewish lady Thor fare in the box office; if the executives will be shocked to find that, for once, they followed their (apparent) instructions but did not prosper.

book report: The World is Flat, Thomas Friedman

Posted on by
Reply

An enjoyable read, I think from 2005 or so. Friedman presents a fairly balanced picture of the globohomo; it is mostly about how wonderful it is that billionaires will make beaucoup dollar from outsourcing everything to India, but Friedman does acknowledge that a lot of goyim will end up losing their jobs and need to be retrained as IT specialists and Marketing managers if they want to live, conveniently ignoring the IQ bell curve and the societal consequences of breaking up communities and families.

Friedman travels the world, always seeming in accidental proximity to globohomo billionaires and CEOs. I have a different perspective, having spent the last decade talking to the people who have to deal with lying 3rd-World contractors, and to the quality control guys who wearily report a tenfold increase in problems since manufacturing was outsourced to even the 2nd, let alone the 3rd-World. I’ve met enough (hundreds) of these people to feel confident that the globohomo mostly only benefits the 0.01%, such as Friedman. Here’s a nice picture of Thomas Friedman, dancing in his 10,000 dollar suit before the Ark of globohomo as your town becomes Detroit:

Oh wait. Duh. I mean:

That’s a Rolex Datejust on his wrist, by the way: it costs as much as I make in a year, before tax. I’m presently reading John Saul Ralston’s The Collapse of Globalism, which so far seems a partial antithesis to Friedman’s entire corpus, though from more or less the same era. Such books, being typically from Cabal think tank/journalists, are usually propaganda with some interesting ideas here & there. Friedman writes well, he’s the kind of bluff farting uncle who sits his 7-year-old nephew down to tell him “son, when you’re a man you have to wear trousers with a belt. You know what a belt is, son? It’s what men wear. Heh heh heh. Hey, pass me some more of that bagel and lox, eh? Like I was saying to Saul Goldstein, that’s the CEO of Megacorp, just last Thursday, I was coming off a plane from Nairobi, great town, just like Vegas, gorgeous, they had gefilte like you wouldn’t believe, and the women, they got the best there, cheap too, that’s the great thing about globalism, son, you can get everything cheap. Blowjob, that’s like 20 cents, US cents. You know how much that costs in DC? No of course you don’t, you’re just a kid, but you and me gotta go out one day, when you’re 12 or 13, you get the Bar Mitzvah, we got out together, get us some of them nice shiksas, blonde eh?, heh heh heh, they won’t be around much longer let me tell you, me and my buddies are clearing all them Nazis out, soon it’ll just be us kiddo, us and a lot of the others, you know the diverses, the vibrants, they can be our slaves like the Talmud says, we get two thousand eight hundred each, pretty good eh? So this shiksa and her daughter, heh heh heh, I doodled them, son, good and proper, they had to leave their goy village, these Nazis eh? and I doodled them, ten cents each, that’s globalism son, never forget it, you know they killed your sister in Auschwitz, she was only a kiddo like you and they did it anyway, they got it coming and anyone says different is an anti-Semite, remember that, just call them an anti-Semite and they got to shut up” and so on, though obviously Friedman wouldn’t say anything like that. Look at this honest face.

All in all, it’s a good read. Friedman has quite a pleasing authorial persona, which means that even while I disagreed with virtually everything he wrote – mostly from a philosophical perspective though some of his glowing words would be refuted by anyone who has worked with Indian IT support – I nonetheless enjoyed my ordeal. It will be the last Friedman I pick up (I only read this, and the earlier The Lexus and the Olive Tree because I found them 2nd-hand), since there is only so much to be gained from the works of a Cabal puppet, but I would recommend the book for anyone studying globalism.

However, may the reader beware.

Globohomo got its eye on you, boy.

Italia

Posted on by
Reply

After a decade in Germany, I am forced to move to Italy. It is purely for financial reasons but being a positive-thinking-Quigg, I am mustering some reasons for optimism. One: I’m hoping to watch some historical football:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7-gl-bT9u6Q

Actually that’s it for now. Watching this, I am strongly reminded of rugby. At my 500-year-old school we had massive rugger matches with 50+ players one each side, the Games teachers usually on the edges paying little attention, and so there was ample opportunity for brawling, settling of the usual school scores, maiming, mutilation, gang rape, japes and jollity etc.

I early on opted for “cross country running”, a grim but solitary sport through the red light districts and stews. It taught self-reliance and stoicism; but sometimes I wish I had stuck with rugger.

Döner and dog

Posted on by
Reply

Twenty years and more ago, a Pakistani schoolfriend told me he had stolen a bottle of Tipp-ex from a market stall (shoplifting was his family’s custom) and later, at his university library an unknown student turned to him and asked if he had any Tipp-ex. He lent his stolen goods like a true English gent.

Later, he ruminated gruefully: “Uh, and I thought, uh, like, uh, maybe that was, like, the only reason I was born, that like uh like this guy needed Tipp-ex. So like now like I’ve done what I was like born to do, and stuff and like something really bad will happen.”

I’ll be leaving my little Bavarian suburb this autumn. Last night I went to do my laundry in the building’s subterranean washroom and found a young German nervously talking to someone over the stair rail. As I came closer he said something that I couldn’t understand, then pointed down to a frisky black dog staring up at him from the stairs below. He said, in German, that he was scared of dogs and could I go with him because he couldn’t otherwise get out of the building. I accompanied him down and the dog ran happily about, the German scarpering as soon as he reached the ground floor. (As far as I could tell, the dog was just wandering about my apartment block on its own: I live in that kind of building).

And last year, in a rainstorm, I passed a drunk or crazy man on a bicycle outside a fastfood joint, he was simultaneously trying to light a cigarette (in the rain) and stuff an aluminium-foiled Döner into his jacket pocket, and get a foot into a pedal. He called to me, in barely-comprehensible Bavarian, asking me to help. I was unsure how, exactly, to help a man in such complexly awkward straits but walked bravely over, in the rain.

It turned out he could manage the cigarette and pedal on his own, but couldn’t jam the Döner into his jacket pocket, so I thrust it in and he grunted his thanks and rode waveringly off, into the night.

I have, I feel, accomplished that which I was born to do.

reading faces: Admiral Rogers and Michael Flynn

Posted on by
Reply

Quite a line up:

From left, FBI Director Robert Mueller, National Intelligence Director James Clapper; CIA Director John Brennan, and Department of Defense’s Defense Intelligence Agency Director Lt. Gen. Michael Flynn, testify on Capitol Hill in Washington, Thursday, April 11, 2013, before the House Intelligence Committee hearing on worldwide threats. (AP Photo/Manuel Balce Ceneta)

Brennan looks simply evil to me; there seems something evidently awry in his soul. Comey is a different fish altogether, despite his size (2.03 m) he strikes me as somewhat feminine and malleable, which makes me wonder if he was subject to a MK Ultra sexual assault in his youth. Clapper just looks like a typical high-level bureaucrat to me, a man accustomed to bullying and power, nothing special.

They present a stark contrast to Admiral Mike Rogers and General Michael Flynn. Something nagged at my mind every time I saw pictures of Rogers; then I realised – he is the stalwart no-nonsense uncle/father/teacher from every 80s film.

Rogers is the 80s dad whose precocious redhead 16-year-old daughter, Stacy, calls him after midnight from a gas station payphone, in tears after Chad tried to cop a feel in the Prom; 80s dad Rogers listens attentively then says “where are you? Stay there”, because he is after all not merely 80s dad Rogers but also NSA director; his wife Mabel screams “what is it? Tell me! Oh my God, Stacy!” and 80s dad Rogers says calmly: “Mabel, go to bed” then gets his handgun from the bedside table, and drives out to pick up the sobbing Stacy, offering not a single reproach (despite having warned her “be careful of Chad, Stacy, he’s up to no good” throughout the film) then he drops her off at home into the arms of his sobbing wife, says “Have some pancakes. I’ve got an errand to run before I turn in” and drives off to Chad’s house, Chad is boasting about how he took Stacy’s virginity by force when 80s dad Rogers calmly walks into the frathouse and pistolwhips Chad into a bloody mess and whispers: “You’re lucky you were lying about hurting my daughter, Chad. Because I got some brothers in Angola who owe me a favour.”

And now let us turn to General Michael Flynn.

He has a similar “feel” to Rogers though his nose is a fokcen hawkbeak, begad; like Rogers, there is something unshowy and based here. I don’t think Flynn would be a 80s dad but as with Rogers something tugged at my mind; then it came to me:

That’s right. General Flynn is Jim Caviezel.

 

He is the Man in the Suit.

My joy would only be complete if it turns out Flynn had a big-ass dog called Bear. At least now we know who can play Flynn when QAnon the Movie goes into production.

how modern society flatters

Posted on by
Reply

I was going through my Tumblr feed and found this:

It was exceptional only in its apparently masculine subject; I would say about 1% of my Tumblr feed comprises women posting things like: “I’m sassy and chaotic, if you want to date me you have to be able to lift 300 lbs, drink like a lumberjack, write poetry like Ted Hughes, and make a girl feel like a cherry blossom in The Last Samurai“. I normally just scroll past these with an irritated sigh but today I thought: what the fuck is wrong with these people? why do they post shit like this?

Then I remember Heartiste posting a similar Tinder profile, a man’s, which was something like: “Only interested in a 9/10 or higher, no body fat, under 25, must be charming and sociable”, and this average-looking chubby guy got hundreds of biotches swarming his ass.

At the time I just thought “women are weird”. But what if narcissists (women), who are constantly imagining how they are perceived by others, read this and think “I’m like that! I can be like that! I’m special!” – then, the more demanding the specifications, the more it flatters the object, since she begins to imagine herself as this special paradoxical unicorn, so rare, so perfect, so wonderful.

Not sure it would work with men. At least with me, I just think “Christ, how can I filter this garbage out of my Tumblr feed?” (I mostly subscribe to trad Tumblrs) and if a woman ever told me something like “to date me, a man has to -” I would most likely just walk away in distaste, since this enumerating tendency is part of the modern realm of quantity whereof Rene Guenon wrote.

It seems of a piece with our modern world, that most people wish to be flattered; it’s something I noted with mainstream coverage/attacks on Trump – it implicitly flatters the consumer, saying “look at this idiot! You are smart! You read the New York Times! You use big words!”

George Steiner cryptically remarked that pornography flatters the attention. I didn’t really understand it, and still don’t completely, but his comment played on my mind as I read the above “Captain”. You could say that most of modern society flatters, in one way or another, like a whore.

the mutant

Posted on by
Reply

Controlling for age, race, sex, education, family income, religion, current and past marital status and number of children, more intelligent people are more likely to prefer instrumental music than less-intelligent people. A 2019 Croatian study confirmed these findings, showing that people with lower intelligence preferred music with lyrics, rather than complex orchestrations. 467 teenagers performed a non-verbal intelligence test and were then asked to rank musical genres in order or preference. Those who recorded the highest IQ scores displayed a clear preference for instrumental music. On the other extreme, preference for rap music is significantly negatively correlated with intelligence.

Triggered by Bach

I had a teacher at school many years ago a slightly barmy but amusing and pleasant teacher to whose name we all attached the prefix SAS (there were persistent rumours of his military service and he once beat up and dragged two would-be robbers to the constabulary). In my class he casually remarked that blacks and whites produce different pheromones and exhibit different reactions thereto, so each group dislikes the other group’s aroma. Although, it would seem blacks are generally attracted to whites given the high incidence of black on white rape, and black outrage when whites move away from the ghetto.

In Warhammer 30k, there are planets of human beings who have developed substantial genetic mutations, some to the point of being deemed “mutants” and worthy of extermination. If humanity did indeed emerge from Africa, those who mutated white skin, light eyes & hair, intelligence, swimming, low time preference, higher IQ, whether through environmental pressures, divine action, or neanderthal admixture, are regarded as “mutants” from the gold standard of, well, this:

Diane Abbott, the Shadow Home Secretary.

At present, there is considerable pressure for the mutant to die out, and for humanity to return to its allegedly original form. It seems that the white mutant has a deleterious and dysgenic mutation, namely an almost total lack of in-group preference, and an intellectual sense of shame at having evolved beyond the ape; a sense of shame which has been amply exploited by race hustlers and of course a certain tribe who are genetically predisposed to schizophrenia and an instinctive hatred of the white mutant.

the demonic chain

Posted on by
Reply

It is often noted that homosexuals were typically abused as children. I dare say, if one examined a modern paedophile, for example this sterling individual,

they would have been abused as a child, and that abuser abused, in filial obligation for endless term, and so on back to demonic agency & inception.

Which brings me to this Brucey Bonus:

As I see matters, the problem is with the upper class elite ‘English’, ultimately those of Norman descent although constantly recruiting more widely. Since this group arrived in England, there has been a pattern of coercion, exploitation. Jumping a few steps; what I take from this that the British Establishment is (and has always been) strategically working-for ultimate evil. And that a key part of this corruption is either rooted in sex and/ or uses sex as the means of initiation and to enforce loyalty.

The personal consequences are perceptible. As a middle class non-elite person; it has always been evident to me that there is a shallowness/ hollowness/ unemotionality; a robotic, dead-eyed or snake eyed – quality in most of the upper class people I met. There is no depth, no reality, no soul. 

Of the three people whom I know to have attended a posh boarding school, one boasted of being forcibly sodomized by a 17-year-old (he apparently loved it, even though he was 9 at the time) and another was almost certainly raped. Given that much of the British elite attended these schools, I suspect they practice systematic rape and humiliation, as a form of in-group bonding and MK Ultra-style conditioning. It is not merely the Old Boys’ Network, it is the MK Ultra Network.

I think of Ranulph Fiennes writing that he would never send his children to Eton. I think of the peculiar dead-eyed stare of which Bruce Charlton writes; and I am glad I was spared such privilege. And these are the people who have ruled us for centuries.