how long has Cabal been in control?

Some trace Cabal’s lineage back to ancient Sumeria. I assume Cabal is ultimately answerable to non-human, non-physical intelligences, demons if you will, who would predate our oldest records. In recent human history, I think they were embedded in Great Britain before America, judging from the tradition of homosexual rape and paedophilia in Eton (the principle schooling for UK politicians) and Churchill’s obeisance before the worldly powers that be.

In America, I suspect it could be dated to 1963.

Cabal have (I judge) repeatedly tried to assassinate Trump, without success. But each attempt has been passed off as a vehicular accident or lone maniacs trying to get into the White House with a machete etc. There has been nothing as blatant as JFK’s assassination on November 22, 1963 in Dealey Plaza.

If one compares the murders of JFK and his brother to the attempts on Trump, I note that Cabal are acting much more discreetly with the God Emperor, and much less successfully. I believe the reasons are: they fear exposure in the internet age, and this time the NSA and shadow factions in CIA and FBI (among others) are actually on Trump’s side – my intuition is that even among those deepest in the darkness, some are supporting Trump for their own reasons.

The outrage Trump has occasioned among Cabal mouthpieces, to a far greater degree than Dubya, suggests he is a genuine outsider and, for all his Israel-pandering, a real threat to Cabal. My theory is that, after JFK, every US President was either a carefully-selected puppet (LBJ, Clinton, Bush, Obama) or tolerated within limits (Reagan, Nixon, Ford, Carter). Nixon, for all his many faults, strikes me as non-Cabal, a merely humanly corrupt individual.

My guess is, that after JFK it was no longer necessary to kill US Presidents – with the exception of Reagan

who presumably came to some accommodation with Cabal after a friend of his Vice President’s shot him in March 1981. The fact that Cabal so openly took out JFK and his brother, took a shot at Reagan, but left Clinton, Bush, Obama etc. untouched suggests they were more or less in control by the mid-60s, Reagan being an aberration whose reign they reined in as much as possible.

As further corroboration, can you imagine a modern POTUS giving a public address like this:

This conjunction of an immense military establishment and a large arms industry is new in the American experience. The total influence-economic, political, even spiritual-is felt in every city, every state house, every office of the Federal government. We recognize the imperative need for this development. Yet we must not fail to comprehend its grave implications. Our toil, resources and livelihood are all involved; so is the very structure of our society.

In the councils of government, we must guard against the acquisition of unwarranted influence, whether sought or unsought, by the military-industrial complex. The potential for the disastrous rise of misplaced power exists and will persist.

We must never let the weight of this combination endanger our liberties or democratic processes. We should take nothing for granted. Only an alert and knowledgeable citizenry can compel the proper meshing of huge industrial and military machinery of defense with our peaceful methods and goals, so that security and liberty may prosper together.

So, my supposition: regardless of 1913, Cabal had little hold on America in the 50s and early 60s or it wouldn’t have even been possible for Eisenhower or JFK to be elected in the first place, barring a Black Swan event such as attended and feted the God Emperor and still wafts him in his place atop the Cherry Throne to this date; and in such a case, we would have ample evidence of aberration – most of all, in the controlled media.

Cabal being a relatively small number of mega-influencers, if you like, they operate best in a totalitarian society; but they seem to have a preference for totalitarian societies with the illusion of freedom. I get the feeling they enjoy manipulating the well-meaning weak-minded Left to enforce their edicts, at least so far. The mass-media age is perhaps their natural habitat, although they pre-date such methods of control; and, as we see with the Great Meme War, the internet is not as easily controllable as they might wish.

If Cabal only really began its stranglehold upon American politics in the mid-60s, it would take time to transform the institutions of power to Cabal’s will. Accordingly, what we are witnessing with Trump and the Q organisation may be a revolt of the old ways, men formed by pre-Cabal institutions, and we are perhaps in the last time window for such a movement – another generation and the ethics and customs of pre-Cabal America would have faded from living memory.

Corona Virus home remedies

I have decided to offer my thoughts on possible treatments for Corona Virus. There are many options: face masks, full-body Hazmat suits, repeated hand-washing, disinfectants, massive doses of Vitamin C, injecting oneself with bat semen. However, I am a simple man and have found that simple solutions work best.

There is a sovereign remedy against Corona Virus, both as preventative and curative:

That’s right, our old friend alcohol. There are many reasons for the WHO to recommend alcohol in these troubled times:

1. It is readily available. Even when the supermarket shelves are emptying, you can still find alcohol. It keeps much longer than food, and you can always find a vending machine or liquor store in some dark street of broken windows and moaning derelicts.

2. It kills bacteria. It kills everything. Picture yourself staggering about work, bottle of vodka in one hand, dribbling booze all over your fine garments, spitting booze all over colleagues, spilling booze all over your computer, your desk, the doors, the floors. You are naturally disinfecting everything, just by drinking. You are an anti-Typhoid-Mary. You are the great healer.

3. If it kills bacteria on surfaces, imagine what it’s doing in your body. Got Corona Virus? Take a hearty drink and let the booze work its magic on the illness. It will clean you out good and proper.

4. Alcohol, if drunk in sufficient quantities, also acts as a preventative. Picture yourself en route to work, bottle of whisky in hand, lurching violently from side to side, cursing God and women and your ancestors, screaming abuse at all you pass, spitting and threatening them with death and plague. You reek of booze and vomit. You have probably pissed your fine garments. You are a formidable sight.

In such a condition, who in their right mind would come anywhere near you? You will have public transport to yourself as fellow passengers rapidly disembark. You will have the streets to yourself, by God, as fellow pedestrians veer out of your magnificent path. Not only will your stress levels decline, you will avoid contagion.

5. Your girlfriend wants to go to an expensive restaurant and then to the cinema to watch Sex and the City 5. You point out that you will probably both get infected and die. She pouts. She sulks. She screams. You shrug and get ready to go out, having a few bottles of wine to help steady your nerves. She emerges from the bathroom to find you slumped on the sofa, covered in wine and vomit, watching Murdoch Murdoch videos and laughing coarsely.

She decides to go alone. You lock the door after she goes so she can’t get back in. She probably has Corona Virus and you cannot take any chances.

6. You get Corona Virus anyway and the doctors pronounce you a hopeless case. As you lie in the makeshift hospital tent, contemplating your imminent death, you are not despondent, you are not appalled by your predicament. Far from it. You reach under your bed and pry the cork out of a bottle of your favourite drink, and toast Corona Chan. Prost!

Coronal socio-politics

I currently live in a Coronavirus epicentre. Contrary to the news reports, there isn’t mass panic, just more people wearing face masks. However, I think when the number of cases rises there will be increasing caution and fear, which will in turn lead to socio-political transformations. If one takes disgust sensitivity and fear of the unknown as k-selected characteristics, then it could be that Coronavirus will forcegrow a k-mindset in each affected country.

I used to wonder how the happy-go-lucky “I love foreigners!” r-mindset so prevalent in the more prosperous (resource abundant) Western countries could be undone, given that many Lefties will make excuses for their swarthy rapists or excuse their children’s murderers. But there is something primal and insidious about the chronic menace of lethal disease; and as the “welcome foreigners!” r-selected mindset is clearly likely to lead to illness, it could be that people as a whole will become much more conservative, cautious, prudent. A huge military age African male babbling about how hungry he is, and how you must help him, is one thing when you can fob him off with a euro, or the entire contents of your purse; it’s another thing when he’s probably going to infect you with a lethal disease just by standing in your proximity.

And of course death is a great tutor to erring men.

a note on word mutation

I have so far failed to learn much Italian, just a few useful phrases like chi schifo! (“how disgusting”). Despite having been in Italy for 5 months, I still confuse German with Italian, e.g. I plan how to tell someone “I live here” if they ask what I’m doing in this area, and I come out with “Io wohne qui”. Similarly with numbers, it takes real effort not to say, e.g. fünf instead of cinque. I notice that it happens mostly with high-frequency words like live, work, drink, want, numbers, prepositions, articles. With words like e.g. responsibility or humidity or mosquito, I have no problem.

If one generalises from my case, this suggests that when a language changes, it will be the less-frequent words which undergo mutation; the oft-repeated, core vocabulary will most likely persist.

on divination, Oracle Cards, Tarot, runes, our mortal being

Varg Vikernes had a good video, on his now-Shoahed channel, about “cosmic censorship”. Quoth Varg:

“We cannot find these things that way for a reason. That there is some sort of cosmic censorship preventing us from understanding, because we are not meant to, because it’s not that track we are supposed to follow, because it’s not going to help us in any way, even if we find out these things.”

I’ve been doing a lot of Tarot readings recently, as my life is desperate and I can see no way out. I’ve also briefly experimented with oracle cards but found them often useless. I believe this is because they are too obvious: whereas the Tarot will yield a suggestive image

an Oracle Card will tell you something like “consider your friendships” or “believe in yourself”. A sceptic might say that, with oracle cards, there is no room for the deluded to weave a justifying fantasy. Perhaps. But I have also occasionally had Tarot readings that simply made no sense – which is an answer of sorts; as it were invalidating the query.

The word rune comes from Old English run, meaning a secret or mystery. I believe there is a kind of existential censorship, which limits us to interpretation, speculation, uncertainty. Divination, at least in my experience, works very well but only within a speculative context; only insofar as everything is deniable (it is, in this sense, akin to a “Q proof”). When divination becomes too mechanistic, too obvious, it fails.

This suggests, to me, that we mortal beings are not intended to perceive face to face, but rather through a glass darkly. When I began my largely self-initiation, just over a decade ago, I experienced a number of omens, real-world events, visions, and assumed this was my new normal; instead, after a few weeks things returned (largely) to the banal. I noticed this with others – when they entered the Path, they experienced dazzling tokens of the divine, and then nothing. Some, naturally, lose faith and become apostate; hopping from faith to faith until they finally become secular materialists who wish there was a spiritual force to things, but cannot believe. They are, if not hollow men, at least destitute and forlorn:

Because I do not hope to turn again
Because I do not hope
Because I do not hope to turn
Desiring this man’s gift and that man’s scope
I no longer strive to strive towards such things
(Why should the agèd eagle stretch its wings?)
Why should I mourn
The vanished power of the usual reign?

In Eliot’s poem, the speaker is placed between worlds, unable to devote himself to the merely material, unable to wholly believe. I would say, it is important to recall and rekindle the tokens of faith:

But the fountain sprang up and the bird sang down
Redeem the time, redeem the dream
The token of the word unheard, unspoken

Till the wind shake a thousand whispers from the yew

And after this our exile

In our material exist, we require the patience and deep roots of the yew, the death tree.