I’ve decided to post some of Trump’s most amusing tweets, as he comes up with some hilarious turns of phrase:


I will try to use some of this language in future, “the most vicious dogs, the most ominous weapons”.
I’ve decided to post some of Trump’s most amusing tweets, as he comes up with some hilarious turns of phrase:


I will try to use some of this language in future, “the most vicious dogs, the most ominous weapons”.
A phenomenon I’ve only recently noticed on the Right, a kind of anti-virtue signalling where the individual (usually a commenter on blogs or Youtube videos) aggressively signals an utter lack of compassion, fairness, etc., on the grounds that such moral sentiments are Leftist tools, and that in any case for all their blather the Left don’t actually have any compassion or fairness, so why should the Right?
It’s a prevailing note struck in Vox Day’s comment section, e.g. regarding the death of George Floyd. As far as I can tell, Floyd may have tried to forge a check, the police were called, and one of them for some reason subdued him by kneeling on his neck until he died. Floyd was a huge man and looks drunk or high from the available footage, so I can understand the police using a higher degree of force, but it’s difficult to justify kneeling on an inert man’s neck for several minutes.
Now the local black communities are rioting and looting to express their displeasure; and of course because destroying & stealing stuff is fun.
The comments on Vox Day’s post are instructive. A small number say the police basically murdered Floyd and people are right to be pissed off. These commenters are then attacked by Vox Day and other regulars, accused of being race traitors, “virtue signallers”, and so on. I found it baffling and wondered if I’d missed something, since as far as I could tell the first lot were simply saying that the police shouldn’t kneel on a non-violent suspect’s neck until he dies, which seems fairly reasonable. Then I realised, Oh! They mean that because Floyd was black, no one should criticise the police. Oh.
I’m regularly accused of being a Nazi, a racist etc., but I guess I’m not racist enough for this ride.
I wasn’t disturbed so much by the racist sentiment (that only a virtue-signalling race traitor would object to police more or less randomly murdering blacks) as by the triumphal, snarling tone of the anti-virtue-signallers; it reminded me of the irritating peacockery of the Leftist virtue-signallers; both operate within a clearly-defined arena, within which they are sure their opinions will be not merely accepted but respected, and for which they will be accorded honour and acclaim. For all their venom and bravado, the anti-virtue-signallers are servile dogs snarling for their master’s approval.
As an old dog, I often think back to the formative artistic experiences of my late teens & early 20s. I have left most of them behind for one reason or another; some, like Nietzsche have receded as I only want to read him in German which means one page per 10 minutes; others, like U2, have become shameless globohomo shills, and Bono’s voice and talent have both disappeared; Tori Amos is a little special – as an impressionable 17-year-old, I found this hot redhead enticing & exciting
and she led me to read Neil Gaiman’s Sandman series. I even saw a concert of hers and got the eerie impression she was repeatedly looking directly at me – though I suspect this was a mere performative trick. Little Earthquakes was (I think) the first CD I ever bought, along with Metallica’s …And Justice for All; I was mesmerised by it, by the gorgeous ‘Silent All These Years’
Lyrics like “Yes I know what you think of me, you never shut up” cut to the point with an everyday unpoetic poetry, if you like.
As I grew older, I lost interest in her new music and increasingly disliked her persona; in my 20s I had been a little bruised by narcissists, and also come to recoil from my own narcissistic tendencies, and so perceived the exhibitionism, vanity, and grandiosity in Tori Amos; not merely in her “shocking” cover art:

but in her very musical technique – too many pointless trills, to showcase her voice. Of course, every performer tends to be a narcissist but I found her blend increasingly offputting. A couple of years ago I realised I hadn’t played any of her music in a decade and so googled, and found this (quite good) song with her daughter:
It’s nothing special; just what you would expect from an expensive studio, producer, and sufficient vocal talent. I was struck, however, by the expressions on both women’s faces – a smug, knowing, “I am better than you” look which I call the Streep. It’s a look I saw on one of the narcissists I knew in my early 20s, let’s call her B, a largely talentless midwit who read a book every six months and has now become a Guardian-reading school teacher; B is now marked by a look of permanent sneering hauteur, and finger-wagging certitude:

– a look to which I respond with either the Mel or the Vince:

Recently, I’ve had some Tori Amos songs in my head; the one which returns most often is ‘Tear In Your Hand’, not one of the big hits but, more & more, my favourite.
It’s a great break-up song:
I don’t believe you’re leaving cause me and Charles Manson like the same ice cream
I think it’s that girl and I think there’re pieces of me you’ve never seen
Maybe she’s just pieces of me you’ve never seen well
All in all, my middle-aged self is glad she existed for my 17-year-old self.
My city here in North Italy is slowly returning to normal, the streets full of people, albeit people in masks. It is curious how quickly everyone accepted the masks & gloves as not merely a medical necessity but even as somehow acceptable, as normal.
I hate wearing both mask and gloves, so rarely go out even for a stroll. My mask is several weeks old – I was given one for free back in April and have been wearing it every time I go outside; I gather we are supposed to throw them away after a couple of hours. I also recycle plastic gloves for several days, even though they are free at every supermarket.
After watching this video of Dave Cullen’s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O0fsg8ijn8E
my initially mild scepticism has developed into full-blown tinhattery; I think the Wuflu is basically a bad flu, particularly dangerous for East Asians and the elderly, and highly infectious, but otherwise of little import.
I wear the mask to placate the rabble. The other day, tugging it off as soon as I entered the gates of my palace, I reflected that the mask could stand for most of my social interactions – I see no point to it, feel at best uneasily acquiescent, but force myself to comply because it is, after all, what everyone expects.
TV docudrama about the 1986 nuclear plant explosion. Morgoth made a great video about it here:
The series opens just after the initial explosion, with a group of largely bewildered technicians in the control room, their chainsmoking manager Dyatlov alternately blaming them for everything and snapping that it’s just a minor leak (when in fact the core reactor has exploded). The action then moves higher up the chain of bureaucracy, all the way (briefly) to Gorbachov, and then comes to focus on Valery Legasov, Deputy Director of the Kurchatov Institute of Atomic Energy

and Boris Shcherbina, vice-chairman of the Council of Ministers

It is quite superb.
I enjoyed Chernobyl as study of responsibility through management. The initial manager, Dyatlov, is an appalling, stupid, venomous human being and as such typical of low-level team leaders in every organisation; I had several (female) managers like Dyatlov when I did office work: spiteful ignorant creatures who issue stupid orders and then, as here with Dyatlov, scream, “What did you do?” when things go wrong. I wouldn’t even label him a typical Soviet, he is simply what you get in every organisation if you incentivise quotas over reality. The whole series exemplifies many of Bruce Charlton’s critiques of our Ahrimanic age.
Shcherbina begins as a much higher-level version of Dyatlov, interested only in a skilful cover-up. However, as he is drawn into the horror – and the opening episode has an overwhelming, Cthulhu-esque ambience to it, as if something not merely harmful but actively evil has been unleashed – Shcherbina becomes a fully human man, a man indeed. The crucial point is when hundreds of miners are basically sent to their deaths to tunnel under the reactor, and the leader asks Shcherbina if his men will be taken care of; the correct Soviet/managerial response would be to smile and assure them that everything will be fine. Earlier in the show, the Minister of Coal had arrived in a nice blue suit to send the workers to Chernobyl:
They agree to the job and pat him on the shoulder and face with their coal-smeared hands; as one says:

“Now you look like the Minister of Coal”.
There is a powerful implied contrast between the blue-suited fop and the grimy workers (the latter will later strip naked to toil in the hot tunnel); a contrast between the born bureaucrat, and the men who work.
So when, some days later, the leader asks Shcherbina if his men will be taken care of, and Shcherbina says simply, honestly, “I don’t know”, it is a mark of Shcherbina’s own turning away from lies and “management”; a turning towards work and honesty. It’s a small moment, but Legasov gives him a startled glance, understanding the rarity of such clarity, of Gerontion’s “I would meet you upon this honestly”.
There are other ghastly managers. I especially loathed Viktor Bryukhanov, expertly played by Con O’Neill. He strongly reminded me of an apple polisher I knew at university, 20 years ago, a man who seemed to have been created in a managerial seminar. My apple polisher acquaintance was a thoroughly dishonest individual; he did not indulge in petty lies but rather angled his cunning, cowardly, mendacious self to reflect whatever pose would best serve his interests. Bryukhanov is just such a gloating, self-satisfied bureaucrat, a man thoroughly at home with lies and manipulation – indeed, he would despise the miners as naive simpletons, and be baffled and contemptuous of Shcherbina’s personal redemption; for a man like Bryukhanov, lies & manipulation are merely management tools.

You could view Chernobyl as a show about men in all their varieties of humanity & inhumanity: the life-shredding radiation unleashed by the uncaring, stupid Dyatlov; only contained through the enormous sacrifice of real workers; all of the credit, naturally, being taken by the management, by just the kinds of apple polishers who created the disaster through their embrace of unreality, their refusal of the real and the human.
A book I found on sale in a 2nd-hand bookshop in Munich a couple of years ago. I like maps so bought it after a quick flick-through; and read it in April on my balcony in the Coronasun. It’s a semi-academic work from 1949; this was a good time for intelligent academic works – scholarly books from between, say, 1945 and 1990 are usually quite disciplined, professional, but still human and approachable. Before World War 2 a lot of academic works tend to the eccentric, and while this is charming it can be offputting, if you’re used to a certain professionalism; round about the late 80s the noxious influence of (((French))) Marxists like Derrida effectively ruined academia, so that post-80s writing is increasingly, stridently ideological (regardless of the ostensible topic); and, just as bad for the sensitive reader, the modern academic writes a rebarbatively dull prose, a kind of literary Brutalism.
Brown’s book is, as the title suggests, a history of maps and mapmaking, beginning in antiquity and ending in the late 1930s; it takes in the political/military implications, and covers scientific/technological points like latitude, time-keeping, etc. The prose is straightforward and capable, e.g.:
One story tells of a loyal Carthaginian sea captain whose ship was pursued and intercepted by a Roman squadron. Rather than let his log and charts, keys to the secret of a lucrative Carthaginian trade, fall into Roman hands, he ran his ship on the rocks and drowned his crew. When he finally reached home he was given a hero’s welcome. This is by no means an isolated example.
This is typical of Brown: there is no thrusting-in of a modern political opinion, no Marxist finger-stabbing or jargon. It is writing from a better age.
Lousy weather here in North Italy, overcast and windy. It now seems mandatory to wear a mask and gloves outside, previously it was only in the few open shops; I would rather stay indoors than go out with a mask and gloves just to get some exercise, and since it’s too cold to sit on my balcony with a book I am becoming increasingly a pale hermit in my cavern.
It is typical of Italy that no one is really sure if you need a mask & gloves to go outdoors; the government change the regulations every few days, so I’ve now filled in three different autodichiarazione (self-declaration) forms in case I’m stopped by the police – each has the same basic info (my address, where I’m going, why I’m going there, and that I haven’t had Coronavirus) but with pointless variations. Probably the latest version is now out of date and I can be arrested and imprisoned for not filling in an almost identical update.
A contrast between German and Italian bureaucracy: both are heavy, but the former eventually makes some sense, as the Hun are a race of engineers in search of function and efficiency; Italian bureaucracy is more akin to a building made up of randomly hurled pasta and old wine bottles and dead prostitutes: it is inefficient, burdensome, and incoherent to the point of insanity. It is as if the Italians wondered at the Germans: “Mario! Come see! The Germana they have-a so many a-moneys! How is possibile? Maybe because of-a all-a tha paperaworka! If-a we have-a many bureacracia we have-a money like-a the Germana!”
Waiting in the local town hall back in early March, the ticket system screen inoperative (someone had probably stolen a cable to sell the copper), the Italian staff wandering slowly around looking grumpy and baffled to be at work, I thought, This is what happens when a low-IQ, low-conscientiousness nation adopts a high-IQ/conscientiousness technology and system. While it wasn’t quite as bad as e.g. some African shithole, it explains the prevalent corruption in Italy: over the last few months I have been repeatedly tempted to just say, Do you want a bribe? Can I pay you 100 Euros and you do your job the way you should, instead of losing all my documents for the third time?
Strangely, some ice cream shops are now open. I’d be curious to know the reasoning behind such a choice, a government office somewhere with a group of grumpy, baffled Italian bureaucrats indolently pushing papers about a big table, then one says, Mario! I ‘ave an idea! We can open the gelaterie! and they then spend two weeks creating bureaucracy to this effect. I suppose it might be a good idea to have a phased return to normalcy, and why not begin with ice cream, especially since the weather is so shitty no one would want to stand about eating anything cold anyway.
The Italians seem to accept the dictates of lockdown with their usual cynical equanimity, they don’t like it but then everything the government does is insane anyway, so who cares.