TV report: Chernobyl

TV docudrama about the 1986 nuclear plant explosion. Morgoth made a great video about it here:

The series opens just after the initial explosion, with a group of largely bewildered technicians in the control room, their chainsmoking manager Dyatlov alternately blaming them for everything and snapping that it’s just a minor leak (when in fact the core reactor has exploded). The action then moves higher up the chain of bureaucracy, all the way (briefly) to Gorbachov, and then comes to focus on Valery Legasov, Deputy Director of the Kurchatov Institute of Atomic Energy

and Boris Shcherbina, vice-chairman of the Council of Ministers

It is quite superb.

I enjoyed Chernobyl as study of responsibility through management. The initial manager, Dyatlov, is an appalling, stupid, venomous human being and as such typical of low-level team leaders in every organisation; I had several (female) managers like Dyatlov when I did office work: spiteful ignorant creatures who issue stupid orders and then, as here with Dyatlov, scream, “What did you do?” when things go wrong. I wouldn’t even label him a typical Soviet, he is simply what you get in every organisation if you incentivise quotas over reality. The whole series exemplifies many of Bruce Charlton’s critiques of our Ahrimanic age.

Shcherbina begins as a much higher-level version of Dyatlov, interested only in a skilful cover-up. However, as he is drawn into the horror – and the opening episode has an overwhelming, Cthulhu-esque ambience to it, as if something not merely harmful but actively evil has been unleashed – Shcherbina becomes a fully human man, a man indeed. The crucial point is when hundreds of miners are basically sent to their deaths to tunnel under the reactor, and the leader asks Shcherbina if his men will be taken care of; the correct Soviet/managerial response would be to smile and assure them that everything will be fine. Earlier in the show, the Minister of Coal had arrived in a nice blue suit to send the workers to Chernobyl:

They agree to the job and pat him on the shoulder and face with their coal-smeared hands; as one says:

“Now you look like the Minister of Coal”.

There is a powerful implied contrast between the blue-suited fop and the grimy workers (the latter will later strip naked to toil in the hot tunnel); a contrast between the born bureaucrat, and the men who work.

So when, some days later, the leader asks Shcherbina if his men will be taken care of, and Shcherbina says simply, honestly, “I don’t know”, it is a mark of Shcherbina’s own turning away from lies and “management”; a turning towards work and honesty. It’s a small moment, but Legasov gives him a startled glance, understanding the rarity of such clarity, of Gerontion’s “I would meet you upon this honestly”.

There are other ghastly managers. I especially loathed Viktor Bryukhanov, expertly played by Con O’Neill. He strongly reminded me of an apple polisher I knew at university, 20 years ago, a man who seemed to have been created in a managerial seminar. My apple polisher acquaintance was a thoroughly dishonest individual; he did not indulge in petty lies but rather angled his cunning, cowardly, mendacious self to reflect whatever pose would best serve his interests. Bryukhanov is just such a gloating, self-satisfied bureaucrat, a man thoroughly at home with lies and manipulation – indeed, he would despise the miners as naive simpletons, and be baffled and contemptuous of Shcherbina’s personal redemption; for a man like Bryukhanov, lies & manipulation are merely management tools.

You could view Chernobyl as a show about men in all their varieties of humanity & inhumanity: the life-shredding radiation unleashed by the uncaring, stupid Dyatlov; only contained through the enormous sacrifice of real workers; all of the credit, naturally, being taken by the management, by just the kinds of apple polishers who created the disaster through their embrace of unreality, their refusal of the real and the human.

Plague Journal, 1 May

Lousy weather here in North Italy, overcast and windy. It now seems mandatory to wear a mask and gloves outside, previously it was only in the few open shops; I would rather stay indoors than go out with a mask and gloves just to get some exercise, and since it’s too cold to sit on my balcony with a book I am becoming increasingly a pale hermit in my cavern.

It is typical of Italy that no one is really sure if you need a mask & gloves to go outdoors; the government change the regulations every few days, so I’ve now filled in three different autodichiarazione (self-declaration) forms in case I’m stopped by the police – each has the same basic info (my address, where I’m going, why I’m going there, and that I haven’t had Coronavirus) but with pointless variations. Probably the latest version is now out of date and I can be arrested and imprisoned for not filling in an almost identical update.

A contrast between German and Italian bureaucracy: both are heavy, but the former eventually makes some sense, as the Hun are a race of engineers in search of function and efficiency; Italian bureaucracy is more akin to a building made up of randomly hurled pasta and old wine bottles and dead prostitutes: it is inefficient, burdensome, and incoherent to the point of insanity. It is as if the Italians wondered at the Germans: “Mario! Come see! The Germana they have-a so many a-moneys! How is possibile? Maybe because of-a all-a tha paperaworka! If-a we have-a many bureacracia we have-a money like-a the Germana!”

Waiting in the local town hall back in early March, the ticket system screen inoperative (someone had probably stolen a cable to sell the copper), the Italian staff wandering slowly around looking grumpy and baffled to be at work, I thought, This is what happens when a low-IQ, low-conscientiousness nation adopts a high-IQ/conscientiousness technology and system. While it wasn’t quite as bad as e.g. some African shithole, it explains the prevalent corruption in Italy: over the last few months I have been repeatedly tempted to just say, Do you want a bribe? Can I pay you 100 Euros and you do your job the way you should, instead of losing all my documents for the third time?

Strangely, some ice cream shops are now open. I’d be curious to know the reasoning behind such a choice, a government office somewhere with a group of grumpy, baffled Italian bureaucrats indolently pushing papers about a big table, then one says, Mario! I ‘ave an idea! We can open the gelaterie! and they then spend two weeks creating bureaucracy to this effect. I suppose it might be a good idea to have a phased return to normalcy, and why not begin with ice cream, especially since the weather is so shitty no one would want to stand about eating anything cold anyway.

The Italians seem to accept the dictates of lockdown with their usual cynical equanimity, they don’t like it but then everything the government does is insane anyway, so who cares.

bureaucracy and evil

Bruce Charlton on bureaucracy:

We can feel the life being squeezed out of us, our humanity filtered or crystallised. Weber termed bureaucracy the ‘iron cage’ – that is true, but the worst of the cage is that we know it as a cage yet have chosen to inhabit it, and that we disbelieve in the possibility of a life outside of the cage.   

I was lucky enough to be born & raised before bureaucracy had an iron hold on my homeland, a homeland which is now a semi-Orwellian state of mass surveillance and mass proscription, where almost everything is illegal unless you are a Muslim (in which case everything is permitted). I was therefore greatly affronted by the bureaucracy in my Alma Mater, a decade or so after Charlton, and one of the first lessons of my tedious office jobs was “don’t try to debate the rules, especially when they make no sense.”

Like most relatively sane people, I detest bureaucracy. I felt it strangled all that was human & good in the university I attended, and in my office jobs it seemed an either pointless expenditure of time & energy, or actively contrary to its alleged purpose, e.g. Equality Officers who ensure that any white straight male or Christian is discriminated against.

It is worth noting that the religion chosen by our rulers is one of detailed regulation; for all its crudity and neolithic savagery it is an essentially bureaucratic religion.

There is, in bureaucracy, a ratcheting effect whereby even when we feel the bureaucracy to be needless and dispiriting, we shrink from a reduction thereof. I experienced this myself in one of my many tedious jobs, in a hospital, where medical students called to ask if they could borrow a textbook for an exam – their library having lost theirs. My initial reaction was a 50-50 of “why not?” and “that’s probably against the rules”. I thought about it for 2 or 3 seconds and said “that might be okay, but I need to check.” My manager said they could come and make notes but couldn’t take the books out of the teamroom or photocopy anything, since of course that could leave the hospital open to a lawsuit.

Later, I wondered why I had initially shrunk from granting a perfectly reasonable request – for a couple of medical students, based just across the road, to use our textbooks. But this is the constantly ratcheting effect of bureaucracy, to diminish not merely freedom but the desire & instinct for freedom. It is most likely a natural psychological reaction, that provided a man has structure & stability, he will shrink from any diminution thereof – even if there are clear justifications, the structure cripplingly inhuman.

The human mind requires structure & stability, the Germanic peoples being the most extreme examples in this regard, since Ordnung muß sein. Just as the Bosche would rather live with a destructive, inhuman order than with freedom, so the human mind will very quickly adapt to structure, and resist its removal. This leads to one natural conclusion: the Tower of Babel.

tower of babel

Destruction:

the_tower

and lest you think this mere mythopoetic speculation, it is good to ponder the EU Parliament and reflect that They certainly built it with this in mind:

eu-european-parliment-louise-weiss-building-tower-babel-building

Bureaucracy waxes as a sense of the religious/spiritual wanes. When Man denies the gods, all that is left is the manmade, and what could be more tritely manmade than bureaucracy and ugly architecture? The European Union is a project for the utterly manmade world, divorced from that which created Man – it is, like all advanced bureaucracy, Satanic.

The modern Satanic idea, “you are god” says “there is nothing to which you are not subject.” But since every human being is therefore god, that means other human beings can create their own senseless order, and force you to submit to it. Hence, the semi-religious fervour of the true believers in bureaucracy – in Europe, those who regard the European Union as the saviour of mankind, because, well, a bunch of bureaucrats and politicians and bankers, and their bought academics & “journalists” said so, and if you don’t like it you’re a Nazi and should be locked up and your children given to the Religion of Peace.

The Tower card seems extremely negative. Destruction, calamity, loss. We resist the degradation of an accustomed structure, however horrific. And yet, as Chigurh says in No Country For Old Men: “If the rule you followed brought you to this, of what use was the rule?”