Tag Archives: Cabal

“symbolism will be their downfall”

Posted on by
Reply

Q has repeatedly stated variants of “symbolism will be their downfall”. The first mention, at the very start of Q:

It is worth considering this sentence: “their need for symbolism will be their downfall”.

Why their downfall? I presume it makes it easier for Q & affiliates to identify the bad actors, although surely some manner of legal proof would also be necessary, in a court of law. Or: once the symbolism is made clear, the normies will begin to see it, and believe that those flaunting said symbolism are, in fact, paedophiles and Satanists.

The first part of this sentence interests me more: “their need for symbolism” – why does Cabal need symbolism? It could be simply psychological. I note that, as a keeper of many secrets, a secretary to myself and others, when I am in a group with another who knows, I often allude to that which only we two are privy: it’s rather like, in Goodfellas, after stabbing Billy Batts and carrying his body around in their car boot, the gangsters eat at Tommy’s mother’s, she shows them a painting which eerily resembles Batts, and Jimmy Conway notes, humorously, “looks like someone we know” and they all laugh; the mirth arises in part because one party, Tommy’s mother, has no idea what they are talking about.

I feel that the elites enjoy flaunting their marks of distinction, partly because we, the plebs, don’t get it – our ignorance is part of their pleasure. On another level, if Cabal is decentralised, rhizomatic, it is considerably harder to crack. Break one cell and you get maybe a dozen agents, with no leads to the next; there is no membership list, no central registry by which they could all be brought down. It would make it a lot harder to coordinate in fine, which would explain why Cabal agents sometimes seem bewildered, or attack each other, or even accidentally praise non- or anti-Cabal agents, before the school of fish phenomenon reins them in. The loss of fine control is probably worth it, to insulate each cell from its neighbour, and especially to insulate the higher-ups from pleb-tier (Antifa, shrieking SJW) assets, middle-management (FBI and CIA), and even from the Clintons and Bushes.

Thinking about how I would do it, were I the Cabal mastermind, I would create orders of obscurity and power, so the highest – the least conspicuous, the most powerful (Rothschilds) – would be as far as most investigators could get, never suspecting that even these shadowy, potent agents are, at the end of the day, mere factotums for a higher, almost invisible paymaster, a payseur if you will.

It would be interesting to know how the higher-ups communicate and recruit. Presumably, they accept ignorance as the price of security, that without a central registry and HR system, no one is really sure who is Cabal and who is just there for the ride. The symbolism, e.g. the black eye club:

and the circled thumb and finger over one eye:

among others, may be a kind of uniform and badge of membership – if you meet someone at a party and are unsure, Is she Cabal like me?, you then see her in the above pose, and know, Ah. 

In this sense, Cabal may need symbolism as a school-of-fish identifier, to know which fish are authoritative and which are not. It is possible that even the highest paymasters don’t know if such & such a vapid popstar is Cabal or not, and so they rely on these symbolic shows of allegiance. 

It would be interesting, since the symbolism seems highly simplistic, to feign membership and see what happens. My guess is, the Cabal structure would somehow pick up on a foreign body and test its purpose. Along with symbolic shows, there are most likely also rituals of degradation and violence, e.g. the receiving of a black eye, and the destruction of children through rape, especially anal rape (another black eye, of sorts). 

I get the feeling there is a great deal of looseness to Cabal structure, that individuals may disagree, may even hate each other, may be disinclined to certain courses, but it’s accepted and tolerated, provided they are largely aligned to Cabal goals, or at least do not oppose them.

It is disturbing to consider what men like Dubya and “Pope” Francis did to enter the higher circles – most likely, child rape and murder, deeds from which there is no return. It’s differently disturbing to consider who would have the power to inflict a black eye on someone like Prince Philip, George W Bush, or a Pope. 

Whoever this is, they understand earthly power. But then, so does Donald Trump.

double half-book report: V.E. Schwab and James Hawes

Posted on by
Reply

1. Two books I got halfway through before deciding to quit, V.E. Schwab’s A Darker Shade of Magic, and James Hawes’ The Shortest History of Germany. Both are covered with mainstream media praise, e.g.  “Marvellous” (Publishers Weekly), “Smart, Funny and Sexy” (Independent) for Schwab’s, and “Sweeping and confident” (Observer) and “Authoritative” (New European) and “A must-read” (Economist) for Hawes’. Both books were gifts, and I found both depressingly mediocre and unauthentic.

I knew Hawes from a similarly disappointing book of his, Rancid Aluminium, which was likewise touted as “a laugh outloud rollercoaster, best novel in 30 years, I couldn’t stop laughing, comic genius” etc etc., but which I found mildly readable and utterly unamusing, 20 years ago.

The Shortest History of Germany is okay enough but reads like a contractual obligation with little in the way of historical understanding or even interest. When I gave up (p 136 out of 226) it had become steadily more & more Progressive, with frequent huffings about anti-semitism and Prussian militarism, and I got the feeling this would be the “theme” of the remaining half, with everything tied to the Holocaust and no doubt he would triumphantly conclude that this is why we need all European nations – indeed all nations- to be dissolved into a totalitarian stucture called the European Union or the World Union, ruled over by a few Rothschild bankers. I could be wrong but don’t care – even if Hawes somehow veered from Cabal talking points I doubt it would be interesting enough to justify another three hours. Some people are just inherently tedious, no matter their opinions.

A Darker Shade of Magic is similarly mediocre. It’s by no means bad, it just feels like a 20-year-old English Lit student wrote it over the summer hols. It’s standard Fantasy but very Young Adulty, specifically female Young Adulty. It reads like a very young woman’s idea of the adult world with a wishy-washily romantic, tea-stained adventure story and very stock characters. I get the feeling it was rewritten by an editor, or Schwab was at least partially aware of her inadequacies and then tried to inflate and colour certain aspects of the book. The result is an implausible, juvenile Fantasy world, flat characters, with occasional and incongruous brutality and attempts at “depth”. For all that it’s set in a kind of London, it feels very much like a young American woman’s idea of Europe, with quaint ye olde taverns run by gruff barmen (with hearts of gold), dashing young lady thieves (with hearts of gold) who live on their wits stealing from everyone, etc. etc. etc.

2. When I read Rancid Aluminium, about 20 years ago, I wondered if I just lacked a sense of humour since I didn’t so much as smile, let alone “laugh outloud every page” as per the mainstream media blurbs. My feeling now is that Hawes and Schwab are both Cabal-approved little writerlettes or Schreiberlings if you prefer, and anything they produce will be immediately published, lauded by other Cabal puppets, and pushed in the bookstores and online. Hawes’ first, mediocre, book was published when he was 36, Schwab when she was 26. Here’s a picture of Schwab.

It is virtually impossible for a 26-year-old “out of nowhere” to begin a successful publishing career. You need personal connections, and to pass the globohomo sniff test: to be in favour of open borders, mass migration from the 3rd World, socialism, and of course a supranational totalitarian government fronted by men like Guy Verhofstadt, with dollops of censorship and jail time for anyone who disagrees (“Nazis”). What you don’t need are good ideas or writing craft or hard work, as we see with both Hawes and Schwab.

3. Years ago, I rarely gave up on books. Even a bad book has something of value. But I’ve come to recognise the globohomo and, as one would expect, it tends to homogeneity of perspective & expression. Those who serve the globohomo and its vision of a flattened, manageable world are, appropriately, those without much in the way of individuality – for all their cultivated eccentricities, their sexual perversions and dyed hair and drug/drink habits, their zany & quirky & Wes-Anderson-esque whimsy, they possess no deep individuality or privacy. They are tedious people. Their opinions are tedious, and not even theirs, merely a school-of-fish response to the latest Guardian and BBC talking points. And, naturally, their books are hailed as “marvellous”, “dark and gorgeous”, “must-read”s, “sensational”, “book of the year”, “essential” and so on and so on.

why I am not a Capitalist/Communist

Posted on by
Reply

I quote from The Z Man:

Bulldozing a church to build a processing center may be a more efficient use of resources, but conservatives always knew the altar was the keystone of civilization, not the factory.

This is why I am at odds with almost my entire so-called civilisation, whether Communist (everyone should have equal money) or Capitalist (the successful should have the most money). Though, having written that I immediately think, I would personally prefer Capitalism.

Capitalism at least leaves a tiny space for the individual. The old adage, that under Communism the poet is executed by the NKVD, and in Capitalism he starves to death in a garret, has an element of truth but really not so much; for one thing, I have somehow survived firstly on the dole, and then as a minimum-wager, since graduating with the highest possible qualifications from an elite university. I have written literally millions of words since then, self-published one book (which only 3 people bought), am nearly ready to self-publish another (which will presumably be as successful as the last), and while I certainly would have been more productive had the State designated me as an official Writer and then given me carte blanche, or had some middle-aged Jewish cat lady publisher decided to offer me a 5-book contract at Penguin, I am nonetheless alive and I am writing.

I live and write in a kind of crony Capitalism where the biggest names are mostly Cabal-approved, e.g. the almost completely talentless & dead-eyed Cabal puppet

“Britain should have no borders! I own 10 mansions and no, I won’t let Somalis live there! Gandalf was gay! Harry Potter was trans! Brexit is literally Hitler! Refugees welcome! But not in my mansions! They should live with the stupid poor people!” JK Rowling. However, I am under no illusions: even without Cabal, my writings would not be popular enough to pay my rent.

At a personal level, the difference between Capitalism and Communism is that under the latter I would by now have perished in a gulag; under the former I am permitted to do minimum wage labour and to have a blog almost no one reads, and to write books almost no one reads. That is, on a personal level Capitalism is merely indifferent to me, my supposed talents and aptitudes and proclivities, and allows me to survive doing the kind of jobs reserved for the utterly uneducated (most of my colleagues), for ex-criminals (some of my colleagues) and for the grossly over-educated & freakish (me). Under Communism, I would be dead and my books would have had one reader – an apparatchik who would write a report justifying my extinction.

On a societal level, Capitalism horseshoes into Communism: both are utterly materialistic philosophies, deeming one person worse off simply because he makes less money. Well, he is financially worse off, but so what? Why should money be sole criterion for an entire society and worldview? Of course, it is useful, since it is totally quantifiable, but I look forward to a future society where mere finance is relegated to its true significance – perhaps to the level of functioning toilets, something desirable and necessary but by no means the central matter of civilisation.

Thorina and other financial disasters

Posted on by
Reply

No one should be surprised that Marvel are planning to cast a diminutive, dark-haired, dark-eyed, Jewish, Israeli citizen as the new Thor. Oh, and she’s a she.

I’ve been increasingly puzzled by Styxhexenhammer’s assertion that the only reason companies do such stupid things is for money; in his view, everything comes down to money, not ideology. He, for example, asserts that the mainstream media attack Youtubers because they see them as competition.

There probably is a financial component, but in that case the predominantly left-wing media would also, presumably, attack left-wing Youtubers – after all, how many people would go from watching CNN and reading the New York Times to watching an ancap like Stefan Molyneux or an ethnotribalist like Varg Vikernes? Is No White Guilt really competition for the Huffington Post? And why would Disney poz their heroes when it’s clear no one (except SJWs) likes it? Where is the financial sense in casting a small 38-year-old Jewish woman as Thor?

Vox Day is, I think, correct that all of this is part of a concerted, (at least) decades-long attack on Western values of Christianity and masculinity. The enemy wish to humiliate the occupied peoples, much as the Russians forced e.g. the Poles and Hungarians to learn Russian. Every conquering power denigrates the heroes and mythologies of the conquered; the goal is to break the will of the slave class through constant humiliation, through constantly attacking their cultural identity and capacity for resistance. That is part of the Left’s terror & hatred of Trump – he is a partial avatar of everything they’ve been trying to destroy: an unabashed white, straight alpha male.

But regardless of the ideological intent, companies have to make some money; I was thus puzzled at the sheer awfulness of The Last Jedi. You can’t even call it subversive, it’s just badly made, so crassly progressive it wouldn’t subvert but rather repel; it most likely served to Red Pill a few cinema-goers. Did Disney really think there is a market for this? Putting aside that if you work at Disney & Hollywood you probably never meet any normal people, one would think a budget of 200-317 million dollars would have included a bit of initial market research, to determine how many people will pay to have progressive values rammed down their throats. It made money but there seems a delayed effect with such franchises: people go to see it, in spite of a few bad reviews, but then they decide to skip the next one.

When I consider the confidence with which Hollywood executives announce their plans to have e.g. 007 now be a black woman, I wonder if the world works very differently to how I imagined it. It has, at least, prompted some good memes:

I wonder if, in the past, a film could make money regardless of audience, regardless of how few tickets it sold. Anonymous Conservative has speculated, based on some mysterious tweets of James Comey’s (standing in a forest with a text “so many questions”) if Cabal usually communicated indirectly with its puppets; so instead of a centralized hierarchy with clear lines of communication & command, higher puppets like Comey would be told “here’s the deal, do what we want and you will prosper” and then his “instructions” would come in a very indirect, oblique form, not vulnerable to codebreaking but rather, e.g. the New York Times and Washington Post both run articles about how wonderful some new perversity is, and the puppet realises “Cabal want me to push this perversity”; the puppet does accordingly, and is rewarded.

If so, it would explain the school of fish nature of Cabal puppets; there is often some slight variance, swiftly corrected, e.g.  David Lynch said something half-nice about Trump and was immediately rebuked and bowed his head to the progressive agenda. The Cabal puppets don’t get information meetings and performance evaluations: they are mostly left to their own devices but with many information streams by which to judge the will of their masters, and if they deviate they end up on one of those “Why Hollywood won’t cast____again” lists.

When I consider the utter confidence with which the studios announce Thor will now be a small Jewish woman, 007 a negress, I wonder if they feel sure they will be rewarded, whether or not people buy any tickets. As with certain worthless books which become bestsellers, the authors millionaires, but you never meet anyone who’s actually read it, never read a normal, grassroots review on the internet, the reason some businesses thrive and others fail may have little to do with profit & loss. It will be interesting, as Q et al. seem to be systematically cutting the strings of Cabal finance, to see how black Bond and Jewish lady Thor fare in the box office; if the executives will be shocked to find that, for once, they followed their (apparent) instructions but did not prosper.

book report: The World is Flat, Thomas Friedman

Posted on by
Reply

An enjoyable read, I think from 2005 or so. Friedman presents a fairly balanced picture of the globohomo; it is mostly about how wonderful it is that billionaires will make beaucoup dollar from outsourcing everything to India, but Friedman does acknowledge that a lot of goyim will end up losing their jobs and need to be retrained as IT specialists and Marketing managers if they want to live, conveniently ignoring the IQ bell curve and the societal consequences of breaking up communities and families.

Friedman travels the world, always seeming in accidental proximity to globohomo billionaires and CEOs. I have a different perspective, having spent the last decade talking to the people who have to deal with lying 3rd-World contractors, and to the quality control guys who wearily report a tenfold increase in problems since manufacturing was outsourced to even the 2nd, let alone the 3rd-World. I’ve met enough (hundreds) of these people to feel confident that the globohomo mostly only benefits the 0.01%, such as Friedman. Here’s a nice picture of Thomas Friedman, dancing in his 10,000 dollar suit before the Ark of globohomo as your town becomes Detroit:

Oh wait. Duh. I mean:

That’s a Rolex Datejust on his wrist, by the way: it costs as much as I make in a year, before tax. I’m presently reading John Saul Ralston’s The Collapse of Globalism, which so far seems a partial antithesis to Friedman’s entire corpus, though from more or less the same era. Such books, being typically from Cabal think tank/journalists, are usually propaganda with some interesting ideas here & there. Friedman writes well, he’s the kind of bluff farting uncle who sits his 7-year-old nephew down to tell him “son, when you’re a man you have to wear trousers with a belt. You know what a belt is, son? It’s what men wear. Heh heh heh. Hey, pass me some more of that bagel and lox, eh? Like I was saying to Saul Goldstein, that’s the CEO of Megacorp, just last Thursday, I was coming off a plane from Nairobi, great town, just like Vegas, gorgeous, they had gefilte like you wouldn’t believe, and the women, they got the best there, cheap too, that’s the great thing about globalism, son, you can get everything cheap. Blowjob, that’s like 20 cents, US cents. You know how much that costs in DC? No of course you don’t, you’re just a kid, but you and me gotta go out one day, when you’re 12 or 13, you get the Bar Mitzvah, we got out together, get us some of them nice shiksas, blonde eh?, heh heh heh, they won’t be around much longer let me tell you, me and my buddies are clearing all them Nazis out, soon it’ll just be us kiddo, us and a lot of the others, you know the diverses, the vibrants, they can be our slaves like the Talmud says, we get two thousand eight hundred each, pretty good eh? So this shiksa and her daughter, heh heh heh, I doodled them, son, good and proper, they had to leave their goy village, these Nazis eh? and I doodled them, ten cents each, that’s globalism son, never forget it, you know they killed your sister in Auschwitz, she was only a kiddo like you and they did it anyway, they got it coming and anyone says different is an anti-Semite, remember that, just call them an anti-Semite and they got to shut up” and so on, though obviously Friedman wouldn’t say anything like that. Look at this honest face.

All in all, it’s a good read. Friedman has quite a pleasing authorial persona, which means that even while I disagreed with virtually everything he wrote – mostly from a philosophical perspective though some of his glowing words would be refuted by anyone who has worked with Indian IT support – I nonetheless enjoyed my ordeal. It will be the last Friedman I pick up (I only read this, and the earlier The Lexus and the Olive Tree because I found them 2nd-hand), since there is only so much to be gained from the works of a Cabal puppet, but I would recommend the book for anyone studying globalism.

However, may the reader beware.

Globohomo got its eye on you, boy.

the demonic chain

Posted on by
Reply

It is often noted that homosexuals were typically abused as children. I dare say, if one examined a modern paedophile, for example this sterling individual,

they would have been abused as a child, and that abuser abused, in filial obligation for endless term, and so on back to demonic agency & inception.

Which brings me to this Brucey Bonus:

As I see matters, the problem is with the upper class elite ‘English’, ultimately those of Norman descent although constantly recruiting more widely. Since this group arrived in England, there has been a pattern of coercion, exploitation. Jumping a few steps; what I take from this that the British Establishment is (and has always been) strategically working-for ultimate evil. And that a key part of this corruption is either rooted in sex and/ or uses sex as the means of initiation and to enforce loyalty.

The personal consequences are perceptible. As a middle class non-elite person; it has always been evident to me that there is a shallowness/ hollowness/ unemotionality; a robotic, dead-eyed or snake eyed – quality in most of the upper class people I met. There is no depth, no reality, no soul. 

Of the three people whom I know to have attended a posh boarding school, one boasted of being forcibly sodomized by a 17-year-old (he apparently loved it, even though he was 9 at the time) and another was almost certainly raped. Given that much of the British elite attended these schools, I suspect they practice systematic rape and humiliation, as a form of in-group bonding and MK Ultra-style conditioning. It is not merely the Old Boys’ Network, it is the MK Ultra Network.

I think of Ranulph Fiennes writing that he would never send his children to Eton. I think of the peculiar dead-eyed stare of which Bruce Charlton writes; and I am glad I was spared such privilege. And these are the people who have ruled us for centuries.

 

population control and the aliens

Posted on by
Reply

A beyond weird article by Neon Revolt. I always dismissed aliens as evidently crazy talk, until about ten years ago when I read Bryan Appleyard’s Aliens. I knew the Yard to be a well-socialised boomer who had some openness to the uncanny (as do most people), balanced by a sober intelligence & a fundamentally normal psychology. The book convinced me that the thousands of alien sightings are more than the babblings of schizophrenics and attention seekers, though at the time I inclined to a Jungian hypothesis.

It seems that the powers that be are preparing us for some kind of alien-related disclosure (whether truth or disinformation). The mainstream media, and the Rogans, have been heavily pushing UFO content in the last year or two. There have been multiple MSM articles about USAF sightings of clearly unconventional aircraft, Pentagon officials admitting to massive unexplained activity in the air, interviews like this:

This is not an interview with some random geek in a bar, the speaker is a Lieutenant General. The way she so blatantly digresses from the question makes me think she was instructed to insert this information, much as I dare say Joe Rogan was told to get Bob Lazar on his show last week. If one (rightly) views the mainstream media as a propaganda organ for the Cabal, with some news mixed in there from time to time, it is tempting to think this is all a distraction, lies or misdirection; but for this:

and Trump’s odd insistence on the Space Force suggests there really is something out there (actually, most likely here). I was struck by this passage of Bill Cooper’s, quoted by Neon Revolt:

Another major finding was that the aliens were using humans and animals for a source of glandular secretions, enzymes, hormonal secretions, blood plasma and possibly in genetic experiments. The aliens explained these actions as necessary to their survival. They stated that their genetic structure had deteriorated and that they were no longer able to reproduce. They stated that if they were unable to improve their genetic structure, their race would soon cease to exist. We looked upon their explanations with extreme suspicion. 

This would make sense of one puzzling inconsistency in the Cabal’s actions: they have been advocating population control for decades, while doing nothing to control the 3rd World’s fertility:

How about this: for the aliens (and perhaps also for the human Cabal, with their exotic medications) it doesn’t make any difference if they use Norwegian or Italian or Japanese or African bodies and so they don’t care if the white race disappears under the black tide; in fact Africa may yield better subjects, given it (counter-intuitively) has the greatest genetic diversity on the planet. And so, for our human & non-human rulers a planet of 10 billion Africans would be ideal – especially since there would then be none of these pesky high-IQ, orderly, patient white people to correctly speculate about all the missing children, the flashing lights in the sky, the mutilations. Perhaps, if any high-IQ human beings are deemed necessary, the Chinese would be the ideal: high-IQ but also highly conformist and uncreative, perfect management-class drones to rule over the African gene crop.

Just a hypothesis but it would explain why the white race is being systematically discouraged from fertility, I suspect also partially sterilized (I know several young white women who find it almost impossible to get pregnant), and encouraged to race mix – to race mix not with high-IQ groups like the Japanese but with negroes and Pakistanis and Arabs. If the Cabal could ship in Aborigines, we would probably see adverts like these

and:

but with the Aborigines, the lowest IQ group on the planet, mating with the blondes.

This would also explain some of the elite resistance to the Cabal. I was for a while puzzled that a Manhattan liberal billionaire like Trump, and military intelligence officers like Flynn and Rogers, would oppose the Cabal since, surely, they inhabit largely the same domain; I was also a little surprised that neocons and mainstream “conservatives” like Lindsey Graham and Ted Cruz seem to be on the right side for once. But picture this: the human race is being farmed and most genetic groups are targeted for extinction, the utopian future being a planet full of Africans and Pakistanis and Arabs, the average IQ being in the 70-80 range, ruled over by utterly ruthless Chinese bureaucrats on behalf of aliens; picture an entire planet like Mogadishu; picture hundreds of thousands, perhaps millions, of human beings consumed by these aliens on a yearly basis, akin to the Mesoamerican human sacrifices of yore – I think even a Ted Cruz or Lindsey Graham would realise there is a right and a wrong side here, and it would be better to be Scalia-ed or Breitbarted than to sell out the entire human race to the aliens. I imagine something like the Tuttle video scene from True Detective, the kind of disclosure you can’t ignore; as Q put it:

These people need to ALL be ELIMINATED.
Those who know cannot sleep.
Q

the banning of Varg

Posted on by
Reply

Last night, as I was thinking of turning in I saw two notification bells on my Youtube account. I checked and found one from Millennial Woe and one from Praying Medic, to the effect that if their channels are banned they have backups elsewhere. What the fuck? thought I. Then Woes was streaming

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gZ9qH61OfOA

so I got to bed an hour later than planned.

Varg, The Great Order and some other channels were outright deleted, others totally demonetized. I was puzzled by the choices. Varg had a fairly large channel and spent a lot of his time attacking other pro-white Youtubers for e.g. taking donations (Survive the Jive), having dark hair (Woes), having a Youtube channel and not pumping out babies (Lauren Southern), liking cathedrals (The Golden One), and in the remaining time made interesting videos about gardening, raising children, black metal, weapons, and rather Uncle Ted-esque observations about Western civilisation and its effects upon us and  our environment. The Great Order’s channel was much smaller and a mix of streams and poetry readings & philosophy. Why these two and not others?

Putting aside the often incoherent and senseless nature of Cabal oppression, I suspect these were test cases, that The Great Order and Varg were chosen as representative of certain Youtube demographics, and the enemy will be closely observing the fallout. After they have an idea of the likely response, they will hit other pagan pro-white channels (Varg) and other streaming pro-white channels (The Great Order).

Of course, the targeted will simply shift to Bitchute and other platforms. But I think the point isn’t to utterly stamp dissident thought out; it is to segregate it from the normies. Part of the fun of Twitter was watching Woes, Stefan Molyneux and others bantering with normies and Leftist scum. If everyone to the right of the Clintons moves to Gab and Bitchute, the normies can safely inhabit their snugs and ignore dissenting opinions. The medium-range aim, I think, is to segregate the Right from the Left.

While the Right enjoy observing and criticising the Left, indeed this is the backbone of e.g.  Sargon of Akkad’s channel, the Left prefer to avoid even noticing the genuine Right. The prefer to concoct a boogeyman of KKK and Nazi imagery and project the resulting mess onto anyone who doesn’t want European culture & peoples to be utterly exterminated. They don’t want to actually talk to e.g Vox Day or Millennial Woes; because then they might think, “he’s really quite nice! and he does have a point…”

And so, the proximate goal is segregation.