Many have wondered at Jack Dorsey’s transformation. He went from this bright-eyed young chap, the kind of smart young man any father would like to marry his daughter off to:
to a forlorn hobo who Hunter Biden might buy crack from, in a multistorey car park after midnight:
in just a few short years.
After lengthy research, I have discovered the cause of his Beard. It’s actually quite simple: Twitter is energetically committed to censoring and shadow-banning, usually via AI; however Q has protected Donald Trump’s account from all AI intervention, and so when Twitter decides to delete, let’s say 50% of the “likes” from Trump’s tweets, Jack Dorsey has to personally click on the Tweet, go into Twitter’s admin panel and then click “delete”, fill in a captcha that Q inserted just to vex him, and then click “confirm”. Due to Twitter’s internal security procedures, it is not possible for anyone except Jack Dorsey to perform this operation. And because Trump gets a lot of love, that means Dorsey spends a lot of time in his office, peeing in a bucket and filling in captchas. He doesn’t have time to shower or change his clothes, let alone shave.
Well, I came across Praying Medic aka Dave Hayes through my own Q researches, and decided to buy his first Q Chronicles book when I needed to add costs to get free Amazon postage on some booze. It’s a good read, self-published but very well-edited: I am normally irritated by typos and bad grammar in new, mainstream-published books, so Hayes’ book is testament to how much one can achieve with one or two pair of eyes, sans an expensive media machine.
Hayes writes much as he speaks, in a clear, intelligent, approachable style. The book is divided into chapters, e.g. “Admiral Rogers and No Such Agency”, “Huma and HUMA”, “The Clinton Foundation.” He’s clearly done his research, even as he carefully simplifies it into manageable chunks. It’s hard to isolate anything especially quotable, as it’s all much of a muchness, that is, lucid & no more complicated than it needs to be.
I would definitely recommend it for anyone new or reasonably new to Q. Even I, who have followed Q since early 2018, found new things to contemplate, so I dare say anyone save an utter Q-savant would benefit from the book. Hayes avoids anything too nutty (even if it is true) so it would also make a good gift for normies who are beginning to ask questions but don’t want the full Lizard People experience.
I’ve been listening to this May 2017 talk between Semiogogue and Michael Black:
In our masked times, three years on, it’s interesting to consider the image of the human herd, branded and counted; not to mention the video thumbnail – in case the channel gets Shoahed, it’s a woman wearing a BDSM mouthgag, mask-like. As with much of Semiogogue’s old content, it takes on a new resonance in the Year of the Mask.
Joe Biden has apparently promised to inflict another lockdown upon America, and even suggested forcing people to wear masks in their own homes, at all times. One can scoff, “well how could they enforce that?” – but that may be just the point, that once you have the regulation, the police can justify violating the Fourth Amendment and break into your house at any time to check you’re wearing your mask. Perhaps a Biden government would even require citizens to install a camera in every room, so a central surveillance operator can check for compliance. Children will be encouraged to inform on their parents, neighbour on neighbour.
As so often with our masters’ rulings, there seems a psy-op element. It is already clear that the mask does little or nothing to prevent contagion; and it is clear that Covid is now on a par with the flu, i.e. dangerous only to the elderly and enfeebled.
Just wearing the mask makes me feel isolated, alienated (in addition to the real physical discomfort), and I am not the most sociable of men. Peter Hitchens is right to call it “the muzzle”. For the elites – lovely types like Klaus and Hilde Schwab – we are nothing but animals; and they enjoy watching us muzzled like bad dogs.
These ghastly people regard themselves as gods. For them, we are just beasts, cattle. They want us to be muzzled, to hide our faces before them, before each other, before even ourselves; they want us to shut our mouths, to speak only when spoken to and then only in agreement and submission. They want to take away our higher intellect, to reduce us to gene slurry. The mask is a symbol of their domination over us, like a BDSM mouthgag, like a collar. And just as every dog collar should have an identity tag, so we will be tagged with their vaccine, so they can keep track of us, lest we get ideas.
Perhaps it was inevitable that the rich & powerful would move from competing against each other to conspiring against the rest of humanity. After all, for most of human history the very rich (the aristocracy) were all related, some very closely.
The financial elites were and are likewise closely related.
I was talking to someone from BMW once in Munich, and she admitted that the rivalry between BMW and Audi was largely fictitious, marketing for the plebs (think Blur vs Oasis), that the two great automakers even cooperated on projects; for example they went to a supplier together to discuss a new rear view mirror, which would be essentially the same in both Audi and BMW (they could thus save money through economies of scale). And yet there were others in BMW who thought Audi shite – intelligent people who nonetheless believed their own Marketing Department’s manufactured rivalry.
Perhaps it is similar with politics and war; but it is of course hard to judge – a fairly senior political operator I knew in Germany, who had direct access to one of the highest in the land, was baffled by Merkel’s decision to indefinitely host the Third World, and said no one could understand it.
As best I can judge, the elites – or perhaps I should say, “Cabal”, as they don’t strike me as exceptionally intelligent or gifted, merely rich – want to destroy the white race, Christianity, Western civilisation, and create a subservient mixed race of manageably-low IQ chattels. An impressively grand ambition. For whatever reason, it seems to be time critical, judging from the unseemly haste with which Merkel beckoned the entire Third World into Europe.
Judging from Q’s reference to “The 16 year plan to destroy America”, I would wager that the millions of military-age Muslim males were part of a wider plan, and the election of Donald Trump postponed not merely America’s but also Europe’s destruction. Presuming the timing was not coincidental, I see these two events – the 2015 Migrant Crisis and the 2016 US election – as intertwined. I’m guessing Merkel’s plan was to use the Muslims to instigate massive, widespread violence, either to exterminate the white population or to create so much panic that the people would cry out for a totalitarian regime to take away their (few) liberties in return for security. I’m inclined to suppose the end goal was utter white genocide, given other indicators.
Perhaps the violence was scheduled to really kick off in late 2016/early 2017, and Hillary Clinton would have sent a “Peacekeeping Force” to round up the whites, separating the children for, uh, pizza parties, and most likely allowing the Muslim invaders to exterminate the gulaged Germans. I can imagine the New York Times and Guardian headlines now, after Muslims mysteriously equipped with the latest assault weapons, gun down hundreds of thousands of Germans in an American camp, while the (black) American guards take selfies: FAR RIGHT EXTREMISTS VIOLENTLY ATTACK INNOCENT MUSLIMS. With a photo of a German grimacing angrily, and another of a 5-year-old Muslim child looking sad, perhaps even crying and holding a teddy bear.
In which case, it’s ironic that almost every German I met had a visceral hatred of Donald Trump. His election threw a spanner in the works, a huge orange spanner, and now the Cabal are having to accelerate their program. Perhaps, if they had had another 20 years to slowly tip the demographic balance and weaken the people yet further, their final goal would be, in let’s say 2040, quite plausible. As it is, it’s too much, too soon, and I doubt it will go smoothly. I imagine good Germans in the Intelligence services have been reading Q since 2017, and coming to whatever dark conclusions stirred the Q group to act.
I wouldn’t even be surprised if the Kraut turn out to be one of the first to throw off the fallacious Covid lockdown; for all their bovine conformity, they have a werewolf-like tendency to go from being very nice and orderly and well-behaved to being, well, not; they have survived a great deal and always risen from the ashes of their own near-destruction. And once they decide that a regime is illegitimate, rather than just grumbling about dishonest politicians they have, historically, demonstrated a capacity for organised resistance & bravery; consider, for example, this man who performed an act of public defiance:
This anonymous hero, whose name we will most likely never know, should inspire modern Germans in their resistance to tyranny.
Let me tell you why you’re here. You’re here because you know something. What you know you can’t explain. But you feel it. You’ve felt it your entire life. That there’s something wrong with the world. You don’t know what it is but it’s there, like a splinter in your mind driving you mad. It is this feeling that has brought you to me.
I have always felt there was something fundamentally awry with the world. It is why I could never have been a peace & love hippy; I felt that the world was a war, and I was myself at war with either the world or large & powerful elements therein.
As an old dog of advancing years, I am sure there is something metaphysically wrong with the world; and all therein – which includes myself. So, I am at war with myself also.
I was not the first to feel so.
For we know that the law is spiritual: but I am carnal, sold under sin. For that which I do I allow not: for what I would, that do I not; but what I hate, that do I. If then I do that which I would not, I consent unto the law that it is good. Now then it is no more I that do it, but sin that dwelleth in me. For I know that in me (that is, in my flesh,) dwelleth no good thing: for to will is present with me; but how to perform that which is good I find not. For the good that I would I do not: but the evil which I would not, that I do.
(Romans 7. 14-19)
or, auf Deutsch:
Denn wir wissen, daß das Gesetz geistlich ist; ich aber bin fleischlich, unter die Sünde verkauft. Denn ich weiß nicht, was ich tue. Denn ich tue nicht, was ich will; sondern was ich hasse, das tue ich. Wenn ich aber das tue, was ich nicht will, so gebe ich zu, daß das Gesetz gut ist. So tue nun nicht ich es, sondern die Sünde, die in mir wohnt. Denn ich weiß, daß in mir, das heißt in meinem Fleisch*, nichts Gutes wohnt. Wollen habe ich wohl, aber das Gute vollbringen kann ich nicht. Denn das Gute, das ich will, das tue ich nicht; sondern das Böse, das ich nicht will, das tue ich. Wenn ich aber tue, was ich nicht will, so tue nicht ich es, sondern die Sünde, die in mir wohnt.
If, as I believe, the world is essentially corrupted by evil (and the world is all that is the case, Die Welt ist alles was der Fall ist) then this is true not merely for oddball Quiggs such as myself, but for Steve and Dave, Rich, Eric, and Todd, all the normies. They are merely unaware, because their nature is more aligned to the world’s. They strive to remain in ignorance, to believe the world and the powers that be are right & good, in spite of considerably evidence; they devote themselves to the illusion of comfort. Eppur si muove.
In American politics, the essential conflict & evil is being raised to the surface of even normie consciousness. Q has worked for the last 2.5 years to create awareness of the secret war, against not merely Democrat corruption but literal Satanists
and paedophiles. This is one inadvertent use of evil: to awaken the non-evil. As Q posted, after these pictures:
These people need to ALL be ELIMINATED.
Those who know cannot sleep.
Q
Perhaps, in such a light, the grim look on Trump’s face makes more sense here:
knowing what he knows, having seen what he has seen, to be questioned by sneering left-wing propagandists, who would titter at a raped child and then go for a frappuccino, must be galling.
Meanwhile major US cities are ablaze, with hordes of Antifa and assorted criminals burning, looting, and murdering while the police stand back with folded arms. It seems to me that everyone is being brought to an awareness that the world is not, in fact, a jolly pleasant place where good chaps get ahead, but rather a warzone of insane violence & evil.
The Leftists will presumably blame Orange Man Bad for everything, including left-wing terrorists burning down their neighbourhoods while left-wing politicians instruct the police to stand down. For Johnny Prog, the evil in the world is due to white racism and can only be remedied by subjugating and/or exterminating the white race and certain of its productions (chiefly Christianity). That many of these progs are themselves white, of pure Germanic/Scandinavian stock, makes no difference at all.
For the rest, the sense of evil is more complex: contra the tediously fixated anti-semites, our ills cannot be traced to one race or ideology (even if one particular race is vastly over-represented). In a sense, the Q project is Pizzagate writ large – to awaken people to the widespread evil of our elites; and to direct that awareness.
My guess is that the 2020 American election will be a battle of competing blaming: between the progs who know Orange Man Bad is responsible for everything bad that ever happened; and those who (however faintly) discern the corruption of not merely politics but of the world itself, and who see the financial & cultural & political elites lining up to attack Orange Man Bad, and think, “well if the world has long been full of evil and spiritual wickedness in high places, if the elite is full of paedophiles and Satanists, and now CNN and the New York Times and George W Bush and Obama are attacking Orange Man Bad, then maybe Orange Man Bad is actually Orange Man Good.”
If the full details on Anthony Weiner’s laptop are released before November, it could set the progressives to make a hard choice – between recognising the evil of paedophilia, and the wholly invented evil of Orange Man Bad; I am frankly baffled that anyone could see Trump as evil – an obnoxious, abrasive asshole, yes, but evil…?
One way or another the American people will have to face evil, the flaw in the world.
For this reason, I think there will also be a religious revival, most likely Christianity since it is familiar, and it addresses evil, indeed places evil at the centre of its theology.
Good to be back in the jungle. Folks are really excited and the wood chipper has been tested on several of Maduro`s followers.The Gold Miners and Crime lords have split up many of the spoils and interestingly enough they plan on fixing the country and helping a lot of people Maduro has been fucking over for a long time. They really hate the Iranians and the Cubans. Suspect the oil seizure will set things off. With the Capital going dark soon there after and Maduro being well dealt with. China is fucked. They are trying to flood the country to save the dam but they have made mistakes in their diversion systems and with pending earthquakes well enjoy the ride. Time travel, the beginning point is to understand the underlying meaning of Aristotle`s discussion of time in his work. “The Physics”. From here realize time is an internal issue as much as an external one. And there are a number of ways to make the journey. Also consider that language is a complete failure in dealing with time and to look beyond language and simply gaze into the darkness. For example there are individuals who have made the journey by overcoming the limitations that many folks place on themselves. Think in terms of the imagination as the trigger added to stimulation. For example Patton well these comments are simply a statement of fact.
Others have been known to have an inclination to time travel. There is something inherently in their chemistry that triggers a rip in space and time that allow them to move in time much the same way most folks simply move in the present. There exists in a Cherokee family several folks who have this gift. In fact one member was a pilot in WWII and at the Battle of Midway simply disappeared in mid-flight to reappear in California in 1849. And later recruited at Harvard by a very special group. And the gates. Later with photos of this family. Business calls.
–
Well, that’s a lot to digest. It occurs to me, what if memory is essentially time/space travel? – that we are not accessing a record stored in the brain, computer-style, but rather the brain using stored traces as a jumping-off-point to time/space travel, so we actually witness e.g. our first day at school once more? If we can take the present as the atomic moment in which our entire spiritual being & force is made physically real, so our physical reality is a taut concrete blip in the ocean of the immaterium, then future projection and memory enact a commerce with spiritual realities.
In which case, a traumatic memory still stings because you are actually literally moving in time & space to the original moment & location, and as it were through a glass darkly perceiving & experiencing that grief once more. You are not merely “remembering”, but re-experiencing.
When we remember, do we retroactively alter? Is the original experience coloured by the superimpositions of futurity? Could there be moments when we feel not merely the experience itself, but also how we will remember it? – a question to some degree touched upon in Geoff Dyer’s magnificent The Missing of the Somme. Could there be a numinous quality to our pivotal experience? – especially in my first year at university, I lived a double life, richly, feeling very much that the people I met, the situations in which I found myself, the daily beauties & splendours & miseries of my first maturation, were already written in a novel that many would read and re-read. I felt to be living within a grand story.
In this manner, one could perhaps engineer events to attract future remembrance. For example, 9/11.
The event will both generate & absorb imaginal force, in the form of attention, intense emotion, remembrance, speculation. This may well be the purpose of ritual – to consciously create a nexus. By this means, you attract & exploit human imaginal power, extending into the far future; you alter the weave of reality itself: presumably it would be possible to create an inner architecture to the event, to use that imaginal power to specific ends, to exalt a specific non-human intelligence if so desired.
For the evil elites, the figure known as Satan has long been one such entity.
But if there are such evidently malign entities and ceremonies, there must be a contrary.
I think this is one purpose of Q-anon: to craft a benign, alternate event, a “great awakening”. There is an imaginal, one could say “magickal” quality to Q, a sense of the spiritual significance to our times. I would love to know if someone in Q-team has delved deeply into chaos magick; if the American military have, in fact, been experimenting with the immaterium for some time, and identified a malignant non-human sentience (Satan) as an active agent within the Cabal’s machinations & workings. If so, one could hardly pick a better figure than Donald Trump to create a benign counter-narrative & imaginal reality; a man deeply aware of corruption & creation, a man in some ways so utterly ordinary as to be incorruptible, so utterly egotistical as to be always independent of the kind of influence wielded by evil, so utterly humorous and ironic, so like a child in some respects, a true innocent though wise.
A note to my Not Even The Matrix post…there seems to me cause for hope. The problem, as I see it, is that most people are NPCs and will discard all their personal experience & thought if it contradicts what the mainstream media dictate.
To take a hypothetical example:
Newspapers/TV say: green tea is a great evil, Coca Cola is a great good.
NPCs concede that their teeth rot away, they get stomach ache, get sugar highs then deep lows, get fat, diabetes, etc. from drinking Coca Cola. NPCs concede that polyphenol antioxidants are good for us; they further concede that such are to be found, in abundance, in green tea.
You then say, “perhaps green tea is actually…good for us? And Coca Cola is…bad for us?”
NPC points and shrieks, NAAAAAAAAAAAZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZI!!!
Violence ensues.
The hope here: the mainstream media message has absolute power in the NPC thought processes, such that if one were to simply change the New York Times headline from Orange Man Bad to Orange Man Good, the NPCs would not only parrot “Orange Man Good!” and forget their recent hatred; because most of their experience & observations and short-to-medium-chain thinking supports Orange Man Good, there should be a sudden & huge momentum to the change.
If Q is to be believed, it seems that most if not all of the mainstream media talking heads and background manipulators already have an orange jumpsuit with their nametag on it. It will be interesting to observe the NPCs, when the New York Times and Washington Post, CNN and MSNBC collapse in bankruptcy or are hollowed out, and a different voice commands the empty skulls.
I try to judge by actions, not words; though in certain cases, words are equivalent to action.
It is true that Trump is surrounded by neo-cons and Swampistas. It is true that he talks more about Israel than America, more about black/hispanic employment than the whites who basically were America in the 80s/90s.
As a high-level politician he has few options. He needs establishment men who know the system, otherwise the lower-downs will simply drag their heels and cross their arms. My feeling is, he is slowly “turning” those he can (possibly Barr, though he could be pure Swamp) and discarding those he can’t (McMaster et al.). I feel no dismay to see Bolton’s frankly magnificent moustache
in Trump’s environs and aura – provided there are no wars.
I assume, when Q said “trust Sessions” and Trump disparaged the man, that Sessions was instrumental in the widespread trafficking arrests and will later play a key, public role; and Trump is playing his usual Bane/Sun Tzu game of misdirection: theatricality & deception.
One must consider the God Emperor’s actions. Yes, he hired Bolton. Did he then bomb Iran, Syria, Russia? No. Well then, perhaps he is playing a broader game.
As regards his Israel/black/hispanic pandering, this is simple triangulation. Were I an American, I would vote for him as he is, purely on the basis of the mainstream neo-con/lib media’s hostility. And I dare say many real Americans feel likewise. There is no reason to seek our vote: he already has it.
There is no point wooing the SJWs: they would never vote for a straight white male goy.
So, Trump flatters the middle: those blacks & hispanics who don’t want gibs & grievance studies, and the penumbra of whites who still think of Republicans as the Nasty Party but can be won over.
From the triangle of political support, Trump ignores and even inflames his inveterate enemy, the hard Left; he mostly ignores his hardcore support; he woes the middle. The Israel shilling is strange, from my European perspective; but I realise many of the normie-con Right in America regard Israel as the Holy Land, and in a sense Israel is a proxy for white identity, bizarre though it sounds to me – Israel is a freakish grey zone, hated by the Left and highly distrusted by the dissident Right, adored by the normie-con Right, most likely funding the Left who hate them – a nutty melange of post-WW2 insanity of which Trump is no doubt well advised. As The Z Man observed:
This tendency has now reached the absurd with white politicians criticizing non-whites based on the Israeli standard. If Trump wants to mock a dingbat like Ocasio-Cortez, he has to frame it as a defense of Israel. Senator Josh Hawley says he would give his life to defend Israel and the Jewish people. He’s not Jewish. He just accepts that he cannot have opinions of his own. They must be signed off on by some group outside of white people in order for them to be valid.
Q has proved an invaluable asset in Trump’s campaign. One of the functions of Q, as I see it, is to reassure the base: whatever Trump says about Israel>America, and blacks, he is a decent chap who wants to serve America as a whole. Every time I doubt Trump, I look at the chaimstream media’s latest vitriol, the Bushes & Clintons, and think, If they hate him, he must be hurting them.
The first 18 months of the Trump presidency saw a 743 percent increase in arrests of traffickers over the first two years of Barack Obama’s first term.
Under Trump’s helm, 9,200 individuals were arrested on suspicion of human trafficking in 18 months. Under Obama, 1,238 were arrested for trafficking during his first two years. During eight years in office, Obama’s administration made only 42 more arrests for human trafficking than Trump’s administration made in his first 18 months!
The corn supply is cut off; the elites are clearly unhappy, shaking even.
My guess is, at some point there will be mass arrests and things will become clearer; though even then, I can see Trump disavowing and attacking his attack dogs – it is a pretty consistent Trump tell, that when he publicly jeers at a loyal servant like Sessions or Bannon, the victim is doing his & Q’s work, and Trump can later look amazed and say “it was nothing to do with me! I fired him like a dog!”
For those in doubt, I would say merely – has Trump started any wars; has he destabilised any countries; have the paedophile networks been attacked under his reign? has the old enemy been afflicted & dismayed?
And, I wager, the God Emperor will bring the thunder soon enough. There will come a moment, a casual aside, and then the drums will roll and the veil be lifted.
Q has repeatedly stated variants of “symbolism will be their downfall”. The first mention, at the very start of Q:
It is worth considering this sentence: “their need for symbolism will be their downfall”.
Why their downfall? I presume it makes it easier for Q & affiliates to identify the bad actors, although surely some manner of legal proof would also be necessary, in a court of law. Or: once the symbolism is made clear, the normies will begin to see it, and believe that those flaunting said symbolism are, in fact, paedophiles and Satanists.
The first part of this sentence interests me more: “their need for symbolism” – why does Cabal need symbolism? It could be simply psychological. I note that, as a keeper of many secrets, a secretary to myself and others, when I am in a group with another who knows, I often allude to that which only we two are privy: it’s rather like, in Goodfellas, after stabbing Billy Batts and carrying his body around in their car boot, the gangsters eat at Tommy’s mother’s, she shows them a painting which eerily resembles Batts, and Jimmy Conway notes, humorously, “looks like someone we know” and they all laugh; the mirth arises in part because one party, Tommy’s mother, has no idea what they are talking about.
I feel that the elites enjoy flaunting their marks of distinction, partly because we, the plebs, don’t get it – our ignorance is part of their pleasure. On another level, if Cabal is decentralised, rhizomatic, it is considerably harder to crack. Break one cell and you get maybe a dozen agents, with no leads to the next; there is no membership list, no central registry by which they could all be brought down. It would make it a lot harder to coordinate in fine, which would explain why Cabal agents sometimes seem bewildered, or attack each other, or even accidentally praise non- or anti-Cabal agents, before the school of fish phenomenon reins them in. The loss of fine control is probably worth it, to insulate each cell from its neighbour, and especially to insulate the higher-ups from pleb-tier (Antifa, shrieking SJW) assets, middle-management (FBI and CIA), and even from the Clintons and Bushes.
Thinking about how I would do it, were I the Cabal mastermind, I would create orders of obscurity and power, so the highest – the least conspicuous, the most powerful (Rothschilds) – would be as far as most investigators could get, never suspecting that even these shadowy, potent agents are, at the end of the day, mere factotums for a higher, almost invisible paymaster, a payseur if you will.
It would be interesting to know how the higher-ups communicate and recruit. Presumably, they accept ignorance as the price of security, that without a central registry and HR system, no one is really sure who is Cabal and who is just there for the ride. The symbolism, e.g. the black eye club:
and the circled thumb and finger over one eye:
among others, may be a kind of uniform and badge of membership – if you meet someone at a party and are unsure, Is she Cabal like me?, you then see her in the above pose, and know, Ah.
In this sense, Cabal may need symbolism as a school-of-fish identifier, to know which fish are authoritative and which are not. It is possible that even the highest paymasters don’t know if such & such a vapid popstar is Cabal or not, and so they rely on these symbolic shows of allegiance.
It would be interesting, since the symbolism seems highly simplistic, to feign membership and see what happens. My guess is, the Cabal structure would somehow pick up on a foreign body and test its purpose. Along with symbolic shows, there are most likely also rituals of degradation and violence, e.g. the receiving of a black eye, and the destruction of children through rape, especially anal rape (another black eye, of sorts).
I get the feeling there is a great deal of looseness to Cabal structure, that individuals may disagree, may even hate each other, may be disinclined to certain courses, but it’s accepted and tolerated, provided they are largely aligned to Cabal goals, or at least do not oppose them.
It is disturbing to consider what men like Dubya and “Pope” Francis did to enter the higher circles – most likely, child rape and murder, deeds from which there is no return. It’s differently disturbing to consider who would have the power to inflict a black eye on someone like Prince Philip, George W Bush, or a Pope.
Whoever this is, they understand earthly power. But then, so does Donald Trump.
No one should be surprised that Marvel are planning to cast a diminutive, dark-haired, dark-eyed, Jewish, Israeli citizen as the new Thor. Oh, and she’s a she.
I’ve been increasingly puzzled by Styxhexenhammer’s assertion that the only reason companies do such stupid things is for money; in his view, everything comes down to money, not ideology. He, for example, asserts that the mainstream media attack Youtubers because they see them as competition.
There probably is a financial component, but in that case the predominantly left-wing media would also, presumably, attack left-wing Youtubers – after all, how many people would go from watching CNN and reading the New York Times to watching an ancap like Stefan Molyneux or an ethnotribalist like Varg Vikernes? Is No White Guilt really competition for the Huffington Post? And why would Disney poz their heroes when it’s clear no one (except SJWs) likes it? Where is the financial sense in casting a small 38-year-old Jewish woman as Thor?
Vox Day is, I think, correct that all of this is part of a concerted, (at least) decades-long attack on Western values of Christianity and masculinity. The enemy wish to humiliate the occupied peoples, much as the Russians forced e.g. the Poles and Hungarians to learn Russian. Every conquering power denigrates the heroes and mythologies of the conquered; the goal is to break the will of the slave class through constant humiliation, through constantly attacking their cultural identity and capacity for resistance. That is part of the Left’s terror & hatred of Trump – he is a partial avatar of everything they’ve been trying to destroy: an unabashed white, straight alpha male.
But regardless of the ideological intent, companies have to make some money; I was thus puzzled at the sheer awfulness of The Last Jedi. You can’t even call it subversive, it’s just badly made, so crassly progressive it wouldn’t subvert but rather repel; it most likely served to Red Pill a few cinema-goers. Did Disney really think there is a market for this? Putting aside that if you work at Disney & Hollywood you probably never meet any normal people, one would think a budget of 200-317 million dollars would have included a bit of initial market research, to determine how many people will pay to have progressive values rammed down their throats. It made money but there seems a delayed effect with such franchises: people go to see it, in spite of a few bad reviews, but then they decide to skip the next one.
When I consider the confidence with which Hollywood executives announce their plans to have e.g. 007 now be a black woman, I wonder if the world works very differently to how I imagined it. It has, at least, prompted some good memes:
I wonder if, in the past, a film could make money regardless of audience, regardless of how few tickets it sold. Anonymous Conservative has speculated, based on some mysterious tweets of James Comey’s (standing in a forest with a text “so many questions”) if Cabal usually communicated indirectly with its puppets; so instead of a centralized hierarchy with clear lines of communication & command, higher puppets like Comey would be told “here’s the deal, do what we want and you will prosper” and then his “instructions” would come in a very indirect, oblique form, not vulnerable to codebreaking but rather, e.g. the New York Times and Washington Post both run articles about how wonderful some new perversity is, and the puppet realises “Cabal want me to push this perversity”; the puppet does accordingly, and is rewarded.
If so, it would explain the school of fish nature of Cabal puppets; there is often some slight variance, swiftly corrected, e.g. David Lynch said something half-nice about Trump and was immediately rebuked and bowed his head to the progressive agenda. The Cabal puppets don’t get information meetings and performance evaluations: they are mostly left to their own devices but with many information streams by which to judge the will of their masters, and if they deviate they end up on one of those “Why Hollywood won’t cast____again” lists.
When I consider the utter confidence with which the studios announce Thor will now be a small Jewish woman, 007 a negress, I wonder if they feel sure they will be rewarded, whether or not people buy any tickets. As with certain worthless books which become bestsellers, the authors millionaires, but you never meet anyone who’s actually read it, never read a normal, grassroots review on the internet, the reason some businesses thrive and others fail may have little to do with profit & loss. It will be interesting, as Q et al. seem to be systematically cutting the strings of Cabal finance, to see how black Bond and Jewish lady Thor fare in the box office; if the executives will be shocked to find that, for once, they followed their (apparent) instructions but did not prosper.
From left, FBI Director Robert Mueller, National Intelligence Director James Clapper; CIA Director John Brennan, and Department of Defense’s Defense Intelligence Agency Director Lt. Gen. Michael Flynn, testify on Capitol Hill in Washington, Thursday, April 11, 2013, before the House Intelligence Committee hearing on worldwide threats. (AP Photo/Manuel Balce Ceneta)
Brennan looks simply evil to me; there seems something evidently awry in his soul. Comey is a different fish altogether, despite his size (2.03 m) he strikes me as somewhat feminine and malleable, which makes me wonder if he was subject to a MK Ultra sexual assault in his youth. Clapper just looks like a typical high-level bureaucrat to me, a man accustomed to bullying and power, nothing special.
They present a stark contrast to Admiral Mike Rogers and General Michael Flynn. Something nagged at my mind every time I saw pictures of Rogers; then I realised – he is the stalwart no-nonsense uncle/father/teacher from every 80s film.
Rogers is the 80s dad whose precocious redhead 16-year-old daughter, Stacy, calls him after midnight from a gas station payphone, in tears after Chad tried to cop a feel in the Prom; 80s dad Rogers listens attentively then says “where are you? Stay there”, because he is after all not merely 80s dad Rogers but also NSA director; his wife Mabel screams “what is it? Tell me! Oh my God, Stacy!” and 80s dad Rogers says calmly: “Mabel, go to bed” then gets his handgun from the bedside table, and drives out to pick up the sobbing Stacy, offering not a single reproach (despite having warned her “be careful of Chad, Stacy, he’s up to no good” throughout the film) then he drops her off at home into the arms of his sobbing wife, says “Have some pancakes. I’ve got an errand to run before I turn in” and drives off to Chad’s house, Chad is boasting about how he took Stacy’s virginity by force when 80s dad Rogers calmly walks into the frathouse and pistolwhips Chad into a bloody mess and whispers: “You’re lucky you were lying about hurting my daughter, Chad. Because I got some brothers in Angola who owe me a favour.”
And now let us turn to General Michael Flynn.
He has a similar “feel” to Rogers though his nose is a fokcen hawkbeak, begad; like Rogers, there is something unshowy and based here. I don’t think Flynn would be a 80s dad but as with Rogers something tugged at my mind; then it came to me:
That’s right. General Flynn is Jim Caviezel.
He is the Man in the Suit.
My joy would only be complete if it turns out Flynn had a big-ass dog called Bear. At least now we know who can play Flynn when QAnon the Movie goes into production.
Remainders 