after the ruins

Until about 2015 I felt that Western civilisation would inevitably collapse, over about two to three generations, and if one could go forwards to 2050-or-so, everything from California to Berlin would look like Mogadishu. But to quote Hölderlin:

Wo aber Gefahr ist, wächst

Das Rettende auch

(salvation flourishes where there is danger, my loose translation)

So, as the globohomo, through Merkel et al. decided to terminate Western civilisation in a short time frame, reality itself responded in the form of e.g. The God Emperor, blessings be upon him.

Q and Trump have both signalled that the Cabal’s takeover of America (and the world) cannot be allowed to happen again. Since it seems the Storm is even now breaking, it is worth thinking, How could one Cabal-proof any system?

I can think of two useful means:

1. Foster what Anonymous Conservative calls “the myth”: of patriotism, public service, integrity.

If people think of the FBI as full of Agent Dale Coopers and Gordon Coles – upright, incorruptible men of law & order – then most recruits should be attracted to such ideals. While there will always be psychopaths and bullies, and the merely weak and corruptible, if most recruits are initially believers in “the myth”, the organisation will most likely retain a subterranean possibility of goodness, in spite of corruption.

2. Teach all schoolchildren how to analyse the news. At my school, aged 12 or so, we had an English class where we compared newspaper articles discussing the same event. The teacher drew attention to the vocabulary, so e.g. one might use “protestors” and the other “angry mob”. At a higher level one could point to what Styxhexenhammer calls “lie by structure”:

Although I was bottom of my class at school, this lesson stuck. I learnt to ask “from where does this report come?” and to look for equivocative and weasely language, for evident rhetoric, unsupported assertions, for contradictions – for basically everything you find in chaimstream media. I learnt to “delouse” as Leary puts it in In The Line of Fire.

This should be taught weekly from, let’s say, age 12. Let the young learn a healthy contempt for journalists.

D5, via Q-Anon

D5. Q has 15 D5 drops, according to a quick search (some are reposts).

D5 indicates the highest avalanche warning:

Curiously, after Q’s

mention of Denver Airport, this (8 March 2019):

D5 could also have indicated December 5, for which the Deep State wheeled out a dead ex-President.

D5 is also a chess square. It is an important position, and so could indicate “we occupy the centre, we have access to everything.”

Another possibility: in chess notation, D5 means the black Queen’s pawn advances to D5.

Only the black side pawn can advance in one movement to D5. This pawn shields the Queen. In Q terms:

Queen = Hillary Clinton

Queen’s Pawn = a minor functionary (Huma, Podesta) who will suddenly be thrust into the centre of the board, leaving a diagonal attack to the black King (Obama?)

Q favours ambiguous, multivalent interpretation. Thus, D5 could mean:

December 5

Highest avalanche warning

Queen’s pawn is suddenly thrust into the centre.

Since White moves first, in this reading Q team will make a move and then willy-nilly a pawn of Hillary Clinton’s becomes the focus of attention.