Tag Archives: racism

the white awakening

Posted on by
Reply

One of my favourite bloggers is the Z Man, a grumpy 50-something who lives in Baltimore. I especially enjoy his lack of illusions about blacks – in Europe I’m surrounded by people who think evolution has granted the non-white invaders different skin colour to the whites (and bone density, and susceptibility to diseases like malaria, cancer, etc.) but identical brains, and thus they only behave differently because of culture: for the purple-pilled, the fault lies in Islam or the gangster-ghetto subculture typically embraced by e.g. Turks in Germany or Pakistanis in Britain; for the blue-pilled, all the blame can be laid at the feet of the white devil.

I was wondering how the Z Man could be so clear and open about the difference between whites & blacks. It’s not because he’s American, as I know several American conservatives who would sputter with incredulity & indignation if one so much as pointed out differences in IQ between Europeans and sub-Saharan Africans. I know several people who simply claim there is no difference, and handwave away decades of studies, not to mention corroborating evidence such as school results, as a far-right conspiracy; I dare say that even if they could be persuaded that there is a difference, they would say that no one should talk about it, and it must all be the white man’s fault anyway.

So how come the Z Man is so based? I was puzzling over it then remembered he lives in Baltimore. Baltimore is apparently about 62% black. Here are the crime statistics, compared to the US as a whole:

Most whites are not really racially conscious, in contrast to the non-white invaders in Europe, and the blacks in America. As the Z Man wrote once, black identity is formed entirely around their opposition to whites: if whites didn’t exist, blacks would have to invent them. The Muslim invaders in Europe are a little more complex: the less violent Muslims can form an identity as Muslims, and it’s only as one proceeds down the spectrum of violence that you find a Muslim identity which depends upon its hatred of the white Europeans who work & pay taxes to fund the largely welfare-dependent Muslim population.

Identity is formed through opposition to that which you are not. It can be wholly negative, as seems the case with African Americans (judging from across the Atlantic Ocean), a matter of resentment and hatred. It can be positive, as e.g. the sheltered hobbits return to the Shire after Moria, after Mordor, and value its peace & safety as never before.

My guess is that as whites become minorities in Europe and North America, a sense of white identity will become the norm; at present it is mostly only explicit among the skinhead types and intellectuals on the dissident Right – but just as (judging from media) all American blacks have a strong sense of themselves as being black and having been ill-treated by the white devil, so there will be more & more whites who accept that they prefer to be around other whites, that the Pakistanis, Turks, Sudanese, Libyans, Arabs, Somalis, are just not like us and most of them actually want to kill us. From Die Hard 3:

Zeus (another amusing point – American blacks always seem to have the most ridonkolous names) doesn’t hate whites, he just doesn’t want to have anything to do with them, apart from sending his kids to colleges founded by whites, teaching courses created by whites, but hey nothing’s perfect.

White identity, as it already exists, is largely negative, and associated with the early skinhead movements, and of course it often namechecks Hitler and the Nazis. It will be interesting to see if this will influence a future white identity.

My guess is that white identity will become widespread round about the point whites are clearly a minority in the countries their ancestors built; and when it’s clear that the invaders resent & hate the whites. There will most likely come a window of opportunity, as the situation is bad enough to awaken a sense of white identity; but not so bad as to ensure defeat in a military struggle (for at that point, there will no longer be a political solution).

anti-virtue signalling

Posted on by
Reply

A phenomenon I’ve only recently noticed on the Right, a kind of anti-virtue signalling where the individual (usually a commenter on blogs or Youtube videos) aggressively signals an utter lack of compassion, fairness, etc., on the grounds that such moral sentiments are Leftist tools, and that in any case for all their blather the Left don’t actually have any compassion or fairness, so why should the Right?

It’s a prevailing note struck in Vox Day’s comment section, e.g. regarding the death of George Floyd. As far as I can tell, Floyd may have tried to forge a check, the police were called, and one of them for some reason subdued him by kneeling on his neck until he died. Floyd was a huge man and looks drunk or high from the available footage, so I can understand the police using a higher degree of force, but it’s difficult to justify kneeling on an inert man’s neck for several minutes.

Now the local black communities are rioting and looting to express their displeasure; and of course because destroying & stealing stuff is fun.

The comments on Vox Day’s post are instructive. A small number say the police basically murdered Floyd and people are right to be pissed off. These commenters are then attacked by Vox Day and other regulars, accused of being race traitors, “virtue signallers”, and so on. I found it baffling and wondered if I’d missed something, since as far as I could tell the first lot were simply saying that the police shouldn’t kneel on a non-violent suspect’s neck until he dies, which seems fairly reasonable. Then I realised, Oh! They mean that because Floyd was black, no one should criticise the police. Oh. 

I’m regularly accused of being a Nazi, a racist etc., but I guess I’m not racist enough for this ride.

I wasn’t disturbed so much by the racist sentiment (that only a virtue-signalling race traitor would object to police more or less randomly murdering blacks) as by the triumphal, snarling tone of the anti-virtue-signallers; it reminded me of the irritating peacockery of the Leftist virtue-signallers; both operate within a clearly-defined arena, within which they are sure their opinions will be not merely accepted but respected, and for which they will be accorded honour and acclaim. For all their venom and bravado, the anti-virtue-signallers are servile dogs snarling for their master’s approval.

what the Left hate & fear

Posted on by
Reply

1. One can learn something even from the enemy’s lies & obfuscation. For example, after Trump’s monumental tweet against the AOCs and Ilhan Omars:

he was roundly attacked as a vile racist, for the gorillionth time this month. He is clearly just a civnat, or at least he acts as one – I suspect he browses /pol as do I upon wakening, and is aware of genetic trends in IQ and crime; but he’s too much a believer in the American Myth to start gassing anyone. He strikes me as a man perfectly capable of focussed nastiness against those who betray him, but ultimately quite amiable and a believer in the capitalist ideal, that all groups can cooperate for their mutual benefit.

I am an ethno-nationalist, in that I think genetics are the bedrock from which a working culture (whether nation, or something smaller like a tribe) is established. Civic nationalists are colour blind idealists who think America is a proposition nation, that genetics don’t matter as long as you say you accept the tenets of acceptable behaviour & belief. I find them naive and a little ridiculous but also half-wish their vision were more than a pipe dream.

2. But why do the Left hate the civnats so intensely? After all, a civnat like Styxhexenhammer merely thinks Americans should subscribe to certain cultural values, which I would regard more as the absence of true values: the NAP (Non-Aggression-Principle) etc., and yet he is accused of being a Nazi, far Right, and so on and so on. It’s a little comical, talking to Lefties or even normies: they regard a moderate civic nationalist as literally Hitler. So, at a deeply cucked conference, The Z Man:

Everyone I spoke with at the event talked about themselves as if they were dissidents, dodging the search lights of the man. It’s really weird hearing people talk about how dangerous it is to be a civic nationalist.

I think one reason for the Left’s hate, apart from their inherent hatred, hatred as their founding principle & motive force, is that they have their own agenda – white genocide, Communism (or any totalitarian government), Islam as the only acceptable religion – and even the civnats stand in their way, since the civnats would say “hold on, I don’t care if a genetic group perishes, though obviously I would if pandas or Bengal tigers went extinct, but Communism? Communism?” So sooner or later, the Left would have to deal with the civnats.

3. Another reason: the Left have generally operated through stealth & deceit. They pushed the envelope slowly, always accusing the prescient of entertaining “conspiracy theories”, so when Nigel Farage said the EU wanted its own army, back in 2015, the globohomo Nick Clegg called this “a dangerous fantasy”; and then, in 2017, Guy Verhofstadt called for an EU army. Or, decades ago, stuffy old conservatives in tweed said all this gay rights nonsense would end in faggots diddling our children, the multimillionaire journalists and TV stars scoffed, and then in the late Obama years globohomo websites like Salon began to normalise paedophilia with articles like this, and Facebook ran surveys to determine public acceptance of having sex with children:

Or you have police snipers protecting paedophiles (many with a criminal record) as the deviants are unleashed on small children, with of course their left-wing parents’ full permission:

4. The Left, having rejected all forms of morality (though they love to moralise) have no sense of objective truth; thus, they have no compunctions about lying. When someone like Donald Trump says everyone can be an American, providing he or she obeys the laws and subscribes to vacuous American values of tolerance, the Left don’t think “how quaint”; they think “this is just the first step – in twenty years he’ll be gassing us all!” – because that is their own project: to begin with small compromises & concessions, and end with the genocide of the white race and the destruction of Western civilisation. In their hearts, each Leftist knows that each compromise is but the first step on the path to the gulag and genocide; and so they are unable to credit the naivety and good faith of the civnats.

5. Another oddity of the Left – they wish to ban all content to the Right of Nancy Pelosi as racist sexist homophobic liderally Hitler…? Of course, it is simply what any totalitarian group would do, in a position of supremacy. But when they claim some MK Ultra wind-up toy was “radicalised” by Gab or 4Chan, I suspect they reveal something of their own worldview: they believe anything they are told by mainstream media, and so find it incredible that anyone wouldn’t; and so they assume that if you read e.g. 4Chan you must passively absorb and credit everything thereon. They would themselves find a medium like 4Chan intolerably chaotic & decentralized but they probably imagine it as a kind of Nazi propaganda outlet with Goebbels/Trump issuing commands & edicts to the faithful.

6. This is, I think, why the NPC meme was so vigorously censored on Cabal platforms (FB, Twitter, etc.) – because it is true.

I had several such colleagues. One looked literally like a NPC – on every single one of his thousands of Facebook photos he had the same identical grin, with the same identically dead eyes. He could only do his job if it was 100% by the book and regulated; as soon as anything remotely unexpected happened his system crashed and he would simply refuse to try. He spouted NPC talking points from the New York Times and CNN like “birds fly where they want, why can’t humans live wherever they want? Heh heh heh!” and “Drumpf is attacking the freedom of the press! Drumpf is a dictator!”

Another colleague – with a PhD in English Literature – would calmly assure me of things which were demonstrably untrue, e.g. he claimed Sheriff David Clarke “only supported Drumpft because the Russians fooled him” and “he wears fake medals, he claims he was a Navy Seal and he wasn’t even in the military”. I found it astonishing that someone who had spent a good decade writing a doctorate on English Literature would so confidently assert things which even Snopes acknowledges to be untrue. And all of this colleague’s pontifications were delivered in the same swaggering “look at you fucking bozos, I know what’s what, I’m smart, not like you fucking bozos” manner.

The NPC has no interiority. He cannot evaluate, reflect, weigh up the evidence and opinion and come to his own verdict – because there is no “his”; no “him”; no “he”; no inner mind & conscience: just a receptacle for whatever the Cabal media wish to impart. And so, the NPC assumes anyone who reads e.g. a cucksite like Breitbart must be radicalised. It does not occur to the NPC that one can read something and not necessarily believe it. It does not occur to the NPC that someone can support huh huh Orange Hitler Drumpft huh huh huh without being a West Virginia meth addict with an Aryan Brotherhood tattoo.

For the NPC, any divergent opinions must be censored. As in Neal Stephenson’s Snow Crash, unauthorized code will automatically crash the machine. The NPC requires Cabal authorities to provide the daily talking points (“Orange Man Bad!” “Drumpft racist!”) and he contemplates differing opinion as an existential danger, as an infecting code.

Perhaps the value of Trump is thus: he rewrites the code.