gnostic horrors

Apologies for scant blogging, I’m overwhelmed with work & humanity, barely able to function with people demanding my emotions at every turn. However, one anecdote from work last week: I was talking to an Italian architect woman with an austistic son, she herself strikes me as “on the spectrum” and is an unpleasant, shrewish creature; I mentioned the great Hundertwasser and she scoffed that he isn’t a good architect; she told me that, among modern architects, Le Corbusier is a great architect, and she would love to live in one of his buildings. “Really?” I said, alarmed, since not even Le Corbusier wanted to live in one of his buildings; indeed, as far as I’m aware none of these hideous modern architects chose to live in modern housing, preferring for some inexplicable reason classical houses of a modest, human scale.

She sneered at me, “You must understand what Le Corbusier is doing with space. When you know what he is doing, it is very interesting.”

I nodded politely, thinking “fuck off”.

Later, I thought this is a kind of modern gnosticism; the idea is, once you have the correct, left-wing gnosis (knowledge), you see things as they truly are. And as with some gnostic sects, this enables a total inversion of morality and aesthetics. Fair is foul and foul is fair, to quote Macbeth. In Shakespeare’s play, the witches act as an irruption into the natural order, and tempt Macbeth to kill his king; from then on, the natural order is disrupted, there is no central axis of instinctive morality and valuation. In the play, it is not so much that evil is seen as good, as that the two are confused:

This supernatural soliciting

 Cannot be ill, cannot be good.

Throughout the play, there are references to nature, principally of this sort “A great perturbation in nature”, and “unnatural deeds/Do breed unnatural troubles” with the gruesome image of Duncan’s horses:

ROSS

And Duncan’s horses–a thing most strange and certain–
Beauteous and swift, the minions of their race,
Turn’d wild in nature, broke their stalls, flung out,
Contending ‘gainst obedience, as they would make
War with mankind.

OLD MAN

‘Tis said they eat each other.

ROSS

They did so, to the amazement of mine eyes
That look’d upon’t.

It is not so much a play about evil as madness – Macbeth and his wife don’t believe they are right, or morally justified in some demonic scale; they merely eschew all sense of right and wrong and are left with chaos.

The madness to which they succumb has, in a sense, fallen over a substantial minority of the West – principally, those deemed “intellectual”. Lady Macbeth appeals to Macbeth’s manliness, to overcome his natural reluctance to murder his king; those like this architect appeal to “knowledge”, as if knowing some piece of technical data will turn this:

into a pleasing public monument. Ah but if only you understood what he’s doing with space, then you would like it, and want to live there, the architect would say. If only you had the secret knowledge, the correct gnosis, the Masonic password, you too would worship the dark ones and spread ugliness, lies, and evil with a pleasing glow of your own superiority and election.

This modern gnositicism appeals by saying, You can ignore your god-given instincts, your nature, you can despise those who still perceive beauty and virtue; you can call them “ignorant”. We will give you knowledge, carefully artificed knowledge, and then you will see that the ugly is in fact “interesting”, and the beautiful must be exterminated and erased. 

They seek to overwrite the natural instincts, to contain the human soul in a demonic cage. Thus, their buildings resemble their own minds: mechanistic, rigid, nasty, oppressive. Those like the architect may not be themselves evil, in the Sorosian sense; but they are “on the spectrum”: they do the dark one’s work, joyfully.

It is wrong to say that all modern productions are bad; it is rather that those which serve “the good, the beautiful, and the true” (Vox Day’s words) are actively suppressed, denigrated, condemned; so we should be grateful for anything post-WW2 which doesn’t make one feel small and weak and helpless. I don’t know anything about Hundertwasser’s life or character, but a building like this – in the middle of dismal Magdeburg – gives me pleasure:

– no gnosis required.

reading a face: Trump in Houston

 

Donald Trump in a relief centre (Leftists would say “concentration camp”) following the Hurricane Harvey floods.

I’m currently reading Hamlet aloud with my girlfriend. Despite having read it at least a dozen times over the last two decades, the process of reading it aloud has sensitized me to the range of possibility in each character – I often have to think “should I read Claudius as slimy here? or genuinely caring?” We just read Hamlet’s first encounter with the Ghost; my feeling is that Hamlet has an innate mental instability (“some vicious mole of nature”) and the Ghost knocks him half over the edge; his later “But I’m MAD!!!” act is both a protective mask and an expression of his real & increasing instability – as is often the case with Shakespeare, the characters act some version of themselves, so Iago is genuinely concerned for Othello, at the same time as he wants to destroy him.

Trump is very Shakespearean, I feel; in that he learnt early on to hide his real self, to project an expedient persona. One need only compare his post-reality-tv appearances to this 1980 interview:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nAgJAxkALyc

Many intelligent & perceptive people mistake his current, crafted persona for reality. They think of Trump as an 80-IQ buffoon who somehow ended up as a billionaire; and a billionaire not in a heavily aleatory field (Wall Street) but in a very down-to-earth and pragmatic matter: real estate development. But I think those who sneer at him as a “Clotus” (nice allusion from Patrick Kurp) are somewhat dazzled by their own intelligence & learning; for these fine folk, being obviously well-read and intellectual is a matter of societal caste; the Cloud People maintain what Michael Cassio calls “reputation” by sneering at anyone who hasn’t read Cynthia Ozick. In Kierkegaard’s terms, you could say they have become immured in the aesthetic domain, and so all their ethical verdicts are, ultimately, to do with aesthetics: “but he hasn’t even read Henry James!”

I’ve noticed that the genuine aristocracy and old money tend to be neutral on the Trump Question; it is the social climbers (e.g. those from Dirt People roots) who most vehemently despise Trump.

Our modern Gatsbies and Undine Spraggs loathe Trump because he early on decided it would be better to communicate with the 99% who hadn’t read Spinoza than those with soft hands and fine manners who make caste judgements based on grammar. That is, Trump decided to communicate with the horny-handed parents and grandparents of intellectuals who haven’t broken a fingernail in 40 years; and for this the Cloud People hate him.

These people despise Trump; they call him an oaf and a buffoon and every -ist, regardless of the facts; and yet this is a man who, on the admission of an illegal immigrant, in a MSM hit piece, demonstrates an unshowy, everyday kindness:

Ms. Morales said she will never forget the day Mr. Trump pulled up to the pro shop in his cart as she was washing its large, arched windows. Noticing that Ms. Morales, who is shy of five feet tall, could not reach the top, he said, “Excuse me,” grabbed her rag and wiped the upper portion of the glass.

The Cloud People despise Trump for being brash and loud, and in so doing demonstrate their inability to understand life as it is for those who don’t read Amos Oz and Spinoza. They cannot grasp a simple concept: Trump wears a mask; but then, it is not a mask designed to flatter the Cloud People (who desire, above all, to be praised).

As with all great performers, one must pay attention when the mask cracks. And so with the above photograph of Trump: what can one see here? He is old, he lacks the usual bravado & bullheaded confidence; he is content to sit half-obscured by childish clutter; he is content to be neglected, to be on the margins, to be a tolerated visitant. Note the baseball-capped woman reaching past him, the seated woman to his right talking to someone else, the negro child who probably doesn’t know or care who Trump is; and then note his smile: the smile of the God Emperor who is tired, old, and happy to have nothing important to do for a few hours, to just sit and let his photographers do their work, as he watches the relief workers and the homeless, his people whether they value him or not.