the zeal of the SJW

At university, twenty odd years ago, I knew a baby boomer ex-professor who had most of the standard Leftist opinions; we got on fairly well because I was more or less apolitical and like me he was generally very conservative about literature, abhorring Literary Theory in good measure. He was also quite brave, in that the university was then relatively conservative, so he was very much swimming against his immediate current.

His great moral touchstones were Hitler and sex, the former being the most evil man of all time, the latter being the only thing worth doing. So, typical r-selected hedonistic boomer. He had a habit of returning to the Holocaust, Nazis, and Hitler at the drop of a small hat, so when I was once ranting semi-seriously about chavs as a degenerate form of human life, he squirmed uncomfortably then expostulated grandly, “The Nazis said exactly the same thing about the Jews.”

I stared at him, thinking, And?

“And sometimes they were right!” he continued, then looked baffled at his own rather odd and (I suppose) anti-semitic remark, before continuing, huffing, “But this kind of language, this is exactly how Hitler referred to the Jews!” and then glared triumphantly as if to say, “I just likened you to Hitler: game, set, match.”

The Reductio ad Hitlerum is by now so common a tactic as to warrant no lengthy explanation; however, I often wondered why my boomer acquaintance would head unerringly and absurdly for a Nazi/Holocaust/Hitler reference, e.g.

Johannes Q: I forced myself to read this ghastly Lit Theory book, I ended up hating it so much I wanted to burn it, but –

Boomer: Johannes, the Nazis burnt books.

Johannes: Oh. Yeah. I guess.

Boomer: Then they burnt Jews.

Johannes: Oh yeah. Sorry. I wasn’t actually going to burn it. I was just –

Boomer: This kind of language is what enabled the Holocaust.

And so on. He was animated by an aggressive zeal to stamp out anything that in any way reminded him of Nazis, an attitude that seemed a bit odd to me at the time, but is now the norm among the twittering elites. I wondered why exactly he was so agitated, so highly-strung, as if he’d gone back in time to 1930s Germany and was just waiting for the jackboots at the door; when in fact he was living in a Leftist paradise of ever-increasing degeneracy and nihilism.

From the moment I met him, in the late 90s, he talked as if the State security services would soon take him away because he was a dangerous dissident who could well bring down the Government; I just assumed he had good cause to think so, since I tend to believe people, but over the next two decades nothing at all happened, the police did not kick his door down and give him a good drubbing, MI5 did not pop him in a sack and dump him in a reservoir, an old school friend did not pop by to gravely warn him that his name was causing terror among the elites, and he should leave the country immediately. Nothing happened at all. He just continued likening everything to the Holocaust, and everyone to Hitler, and occasionally intimating that he would certainly be executed or at the least imprisoned by the State, and the last I heard he’s still doing it, undisturbed by what he (predictably) calls “the Gestapo”.

Why, as the Joker would say, so serious?

Of course Leftists are usually emotionally damaged to begin with, demonstrating Borderline and/or Narcissistic Personality Disorder, but all the same, the frenzied zeal and sense of mission and fear about the Boomer struck me as misplaced and odd. Turning it over in my mind, I recall that his father was wounded in World War 2, and the Boomer grew up in the 50s, no doubt bombarded with war and post-war propaganda about how uniquely moral it had all been, the fight of the good guys against the Ultimate Evil, on behalf of the Ultimate & Forever Victims. Growing up in this atmosphere, knowing that you would never get to fight in such an operatic, allegorical conflict, against so superbly evil an adversary, must have left some curious marks upon his psyche.

He and his generation were trained to think in terms of good vs evil, with evil unambiguously represented by white men who care about their people, their race, their land and their culture. This Manichean worldview left the Boomers with a sense both of a mission, and of being born too late to fulfil said mission. All they had left was to shriek “NAzi! HitleR!!!” and feel, momentarily, as heroic as their soldier parents and grandparents. Like a dog trained to fight an animal that no longer exists, all they can do is maul soft toys and play make-believe.

the right to disagree

I recently had a heated discussion with a SJW colleague. Merely mentioning (to another colleague, but in her hearing) that I was “right-wing” triggered the creature. I shrugged, “but it’s not important. Everyone has an opinion, it doesn’t mean anything.”

She was not calmed; if anything, she seemed more determined to attack, and ended up trying to get me fired.

Later, I fell to wondering why the “opinions don’t matter” argument only enraged her, and why the Right are much more likely to shrug at a divergent opinion. I believe it’s because we project our own attitudes to form a mental model of others’; and because the Right would mostly just restrict immigration, encourage the nuclear family, classical education, Christianity, and perhaps discourage non-Europeans from having large families, we tend to think “well, the worst that could happen for the other side is a cramping of their style.”

But the Left want the white race to die out completely, Christianity to be exterminated, education to become Maoist indoctrination, the family to be destroyed, the State to rule over all. They want the boot stamping on a human face – for eternity. They call it love and tolerance but in their brittle vegan bones they know this is a war, and they know one side must be destroyed.

It is only the Right who persist in the pleasant belief that we can all sit down & have a jolly chat about our opinions, over a cup of Earl Grey and some Battenberg cake.

For the Left, an opinion is a weapon ready to be fired into the head of an enemy. Thus, when a tweed-clad old chap says well, it’s just my opinion their nostrils flare, they hear the hoofbeats of the Cossacks, they reach for their Makarov. For the Left, an opinion is never just an opinion.

In addition, most of these SJWs do not achieve anything with their lives; if they are “artists” they write shitty poetry such as my colleague; at best, they administer globalist oganisations like the BBC or run human trafficking/sex slavery rings for NGOs and charities. They do not think, they do not create. All they have are their empty, borrowed opinions: for the Leftist, the mark of virtue is to loudly strumpet forth the correct opinions.

Thus, when a tweed-clad fascist smiles apologetically, “well, it’s just an opinion” they are

– because, in part, opinions are all they have. They cannot, in the Materium, do more than destroy, and in the West said destruction is limited to beating people up and throwing rocks and writing shrill Tweets; but in the Immaterium, they can host all the principles of Chaos and insanity; in the Immaterium of their opinion, they are devotees of Slanesh, of Satan.

They are therefore triggered not merely by the idea of a divergent opinion; but by the idea that opinions are not really that significant. Opinions are all they have.

It is thus impossible to debate, to have a civilised chat. There is only war.