Tag Archives: the Left

community

Posted on by
Reply

Here in Italy, the town hall is called the Comune. The word sounds strange to me, amidst a city, for there is little, if anything, of community in any place larger than a village. It occurred to me, the sense of community or lack thereof is one reason city-dwellers are usually Lefties, and country folk on the Right: if we take the following as indicators of the Left:

1. Support for a big government to control as much as possible (child education; what the citizens are allowed to say, eat, drink, read, watch; the health services, etc.)

2. Support for unrestricted, mass immigration from the Third World.

3. Lack of concern for Western civilisation or demographics; indeed, some degree of hostility towards the West.

then cities would naturally attract Lefties, and further encourage these three traits. In a village or small town, there is little need for top-down organisation – everyone knows everyone else, most people naturally cooperate to avoid ostracism & shaming; the group size is small enough that bureaucracy and bureaucrats are unnecessary. In a town of e.g. 200,000 let alone 10 million, organisation takes on a wholly different character & necessity. Extrapolating from the city’s needs, the city dweller tends to think the answer to everything is a government office issuing forms and fines, warnings & adjurations. It is hard, for the city dweller, to accept that there is a limit beyond which bureaucracy becomes cancerous & stultifying; because in the city, things would rapidly disintegrate into Mad Max-style chaos without the police, without the government.

There is no community in the city. A city is an agglomeration of people more or less randomly thrown together, trying to avoid too much contact with each other. The closest one comes to community in the city is the micro-community, e.g. the tennis club, the regulars in their local pub; city dwellers will pay to avoid their neighbours, to have thicker walls, fences, to be able to drive instead of taking public transport. The fantasy of the city dweller is one of isolation amidst variety: to drive through the city in a large car, and if they have to walk anywhere they will immediately plug into an iphone and listen to a TED-talk. For the city man, others exist only to serve or admire him – they are otherwise an inconvenience or a threat.

Without a sense for the community, for the culture (that which underlies civilisation), why should a man appreciate, let alone defend, the West? The community – that slowly-built, nuanced network of relationship & responsibility – is replaced by a large, impersonal bureaucracy; for the meadow, the machine. 

For the city man, community is just an old-fashioned word, a scary Right-wing concept (Blut und Boden). So why object to millions of 3rd-world immigrants? Mohammed and Jamal are willing to work illegally for less than the minimum wage, and so what if crime immediately soars, that’s why you pay more to live in an all-white neighbourhood and drive everywhere in a BMW instead of having to take the train or bus, and eventually you move out of the city altogether because Mohammed and Jamal are basically everywhere now, so you move into a suburb or even into the country and complain about how right-wing everyone is. 

In the city, the only freedom is that of consumption; the city man is free to go shopping, to spend his money in as many ways as the city can dream. He can buy things; his identity is formed not by his actions, by e.g. how well he maintains his property or if he helps his neighbours, but by his brand clothing, his car. In the city, mass immigration merely increases the varieties of consumption, from prostitution to food.

It is telling that for the Leftist, immigration is typically justified by appeal to ethnic cuisine, a mess of pottage. For the man who denies meaning to extended human relationships (extended into time in ancestral respect and care for one’s descendants; extended into space in community), what could possibly have more value than stuffing your face with food? Why not sacrifice a Lebensform, a non-physical form of life, a community comprising not merely those alive today but their ancestors, if you can try a new ethnic dish?

Those who value community recognise that it is a lifeform of sorts, a kind of egregore; not merely a definition of the relations between the physically living, but a definer of their relations and their selves; both a constraint and a blessing; in a sense, even more alive and more precious than the individuals in whom it lives. 

the right to disagree

Posted on by
Reply

I recently had a heated discussion with a SJW colleague. Merely mentioning (to another colleague, but in her hearing) that I was “right-wing” triggered the creature. I shrugged, “but it’s not important. Everyone has an opinion, it doesn’t mean anything.”

She was not calmed; if anything, she seemed more determined to attack, and ended up trying to get me fired.

Later, I fell to wondering why the “opinions don’t matter” argument only enraged her, and why the Right are much more likely to shrug at a divergent opinion. I believe it’s because we project our own attitudes to form a mental model of others’; and because the Right would mostly just restrict immigration, encourage the nuclear family, classical education, Christianity, and perhaps discourage non-Europeans from having large families, we tend to think “well, the worst that could happen for the other side is a cramping of their style.”

But the Left want the white race to die out completely, Christianity to be exterminated, education to become Maoist indoctrination, the family to be destroyed, the State to rule over all. They want the boot stamping on a human face – for eternity. They call it love and tolerance but in their brittle vegan bones they know this is a war, and they know one side must be destroyed.

It is only the Right who persist in the pleasant belief that we can all sit down & have a jolly chat about our opinions, over a cup of Earl Grey and some Battenberg cake.

For the Left, an opinion is a weapon ready to be fired into the head of an enemy. Thus, when a tweed-clad old chap says well, it’s just my opinion their nostrils flare, they hear the hoofbeats of the Cossacks, they reach for their Makarov. For the Left, an opinion is never just an opinion.

In addition, most of these SJWs do not achieve anything with their lives; if they are “artists” they write shitty poetry such as my colleague; at best, they administer globalist oganisations like the BBC or run human trafficking/sex slavery rings for NGOs and charities. They do not think, they do not create. All they have are their empty, borrowed opinions: for the Leftist, the mark of virtue is to loudly strumpet forth the correct opinions.

Thus, when a tweed-clad fascist smiles apologetically, “well, it’s just an opinion” they are

– because, in part, opinions are all they have. They cannot, in the Materium, do more than destroy, and in the West said destruction is limited to beating people up and throwing rocks and writing shrill Tweets; but in the Immaterium, they can host all the principles of Chaos and insanity; in the Immaterium of their opinion, they are devotees of Slanesh, of Satan.

They are therefore triggered not merely by the idea of a divergent opinion; but by the idea that opinions are not really that significant. Opinions are all they have.

It is thus impossible to debate, to have a civilised chat. There is only war.

what the Left hate & fear

Posted on by
Reply

1. One can learn something even from the enemy’s lies & obfuscation. For example, after Trump’s monumental tweet against the AOCs and Ilhan Omars:

he was roundly attacked as a vile racist, for the gorillionth time this month. He is clearly just a civnat, or at least he acts as one – I suspect he browses /pol as do I upon wakening, and is aware of genetic trends in IQ and crime; but he’s too much a believer in the American Myth to start gassing anyone. He strikes me as a man perfectly capable of focussed nastiness against those who betray him, but ultimately quite amiable and a believer in the capitalist ideal, that all groups can cooperate for their mutual benefit.

I am an ethno-nationalist, in that I think genetics are the bedrock from which a working culture (whether nation, or something smaller like a tribe) is established. Civic nationalists are colour blind idealists who think America is a proposition nation, that genetics don’t matter as long as you say you accept the tenets of acceptable behaviour & belief. I find them naive and a little ridiculous but also half-wish their vision were more than a pipe dream.

2. But why do the Left hate the civnats so intensely? After all, a civnat like Styxhexenhammer merely thinks Americans should subscribe to certain cultural values, which I would regard more as the absence of true values: the NAP (Non-Aggression-Principle) etc., and yet he is accused of being a Nazi, far Right, and so on and so on. It’s a little comical, talking to Lefties or even normies: they regard a moderate civic nationalist as literally Hitler. So, at a deeply cucked conference, The Z Man:

Everyone I spoke with at the event talked about themselves as if they were dissidents, dodging the search lights of the man. It’s really weird hearing people talk about how dangerous it is to be a civic nationalist.

I think one reason for the Left’s hate, apart from their inherent hatred, hatred as their founding principle & motive force, is that they have their own agenda – white genocide, Communism (or any totalitarian government), Islam as the only acceptable religion – and even the civnats stand in their way, since the civnats would say “hold on, I don’t care if a genetic group perishes, though obviously I would if pandas or Bengal tigers went extinct, but Communism? Communism?” So sooner or later, the Left would have to deal with the civnats.

3. Another reason: the Left have generally operated through stealth & deceit. They pushed the envelope slowly, always accusing the prescient of entertaining “conspiracy theories”, so when Nigel Farage said the EU wanted its own army, back in 2015, the globohomo Nick Clegg called this “a dangerous fantasy”; and then, in 2017, Guy Verhofstadt called for an EU army. Or, decades ago, stuffy old conservatives in tweed said all this gay rights nonsense would end in faggots diddling our children, the multimillionaire journalists and TV stars scoffed, and then in the late Obama years globohomo websites like Salon began to normalise paedophilia with articles like this, and Facebook ran surveys to determine public acceptance of having sex with children:

Or you have police snipers protecting paedophiles (many with a criminal record) as the deviants are unleashed on small children, with of course their left-wing parents’ full permission:

4. The Left, having rejected all forms of morality (though they love to moralise) have no sense of objective truth; thus, they have no compunctions about lying. When someone like Donald Trump says everyone can be an American, providing he or she obeys the laws and subscribes to vacuous American values of tolerance, the Left don’t think “how quaint”; they think “this is just the first step – in twenty years he’ll be gassing us all!” – because that is their own project: to begin with small compromises & concessions, and end with the genocide of the white race and the destruction of Western civilisation. In their hearts, each Leftist knows that each compromise is but the first step on the path to the gulag and genocide; and so they are unable to credit the naivety and good faith of the civnats.

5. Another oddity of the Left – they wish to ban all content to the Right of Nancy Pelosi as racist sexist homophobic liderally Hitler…? Of course, it is simply what any totalitarian group would do, in a position of supremacy. But when they claim some MK Ultra wind-up toy was “radicalised” by Gab or 4Chan, I suspect they reveal something of their own worldview: they believe anything they are told by mainstream media, and so find it incredible that anyone wouldn’t; and so they assume that if you read e.g. 4Chan you must passively absorb and credit everything thereon. They would themselves find a medium like 4Chan intolerably chaotic & decentralized but they probably imagine it as a kind of Nazi propaganda outlet with Goebbels/Trump issuing commands & edicts to the faithful.

6. This is, I think, why the NPC meme was so vigorously censored on Cabal platforms (FB, Twitter, etc.) – because it is true.

I had several such colleagues. One looked literally like a NPC – on every single one of his thousands of Facebook photos he had the same identical grin, with the same identically dead eyes. He could only do his job if it was 100% by the book and regulated; as soon as anything remotely unexpected happened his system crashed and he would simply refuse to try. He spouted NPC talking points from the New York Times and CNN like “birds fly where they want, why can’t humans live wherever they want? Heh heh heh!” and “Drumpf is attacking the freedom of the press! Drumpf is a dictator!”

Another colleague – with a PhD in English Literature – would calmly assure me of things which were demonstrably untrue, e.g. he claimed Sheriff David Clarke “only supported Drumpft because the Russians fooled him” and “he wears fake medals, he claims he was a Navy Seal and he wasn’t even in the military”. I found it astonishing that someone who had spent a good decade writing a doctorate on English Literature would so confidently assert things which even Snopes acknowledges to be untrue. And all of this colleague’s pontifications were delivered in the same swaggering “look at you fucking bozos, I know what’s what, I’m smart, not like you fucking bozos” manner.

The NPC has no interiority. He cannot evaluate, reflect, weigh up the evidence and opinion and come to his own verdict – because there is no “his”; no “him”; no “he”; no inner mind & conscience: just a receptacle for whatever the Cabal media wish to impart. And so, the NPC assumes anyone who reads e.g. a cucksite like Breitbart must be radicalised. It does not occur to the NPC that one can read something and not necessarily believe it. It does not occur to the NPC that someone can support huh huh Orange Hitler Drumpft huh huh huh without being a West Virginia meth addict with an Aryan Brotherhood tattoo.

For the NPC, any divergent opinions must be censored. As in Neal Stephenson’s Snow Crash, unauthorized code will automatically crash the machine. The NPC requires Cabal authorities to provide the daily talking points (“Orange Man Bad!” “Drumpft racist!”) and he contemplates differing opinion as an existential danger, as an infecting code.

Perhaps the value of Trump is thus: he rewrites the code.

antithesis

Posted on by
Reply

Good video by Morgoth and others, discussing in part the alliance between corporations and the more rabidly anti-white Left. I’m old enough to remember Naomi Klein’s No Logo, when capitalism and big business was largely an affair of the Right, even if, as with e.g. Roger Scruton, it was somewhat awkward; fifteen years ago, the Left were resolutely anti-big-business and regarded Starbucks, Burger King, etc. as baleful soul-crushing entities. Perhaps, fifteen years ago, more of the Left had actually worked in shitty jobs and so had developed a proper loathing for the happy smiley corporations they now admire; it seems that more & more Lefties have never actually had a really grindingly hard, badly-paid job.

The turnaround has been rapid. Now Burger King advertises milkshakes for the specific purpose of political intimidation. While it’s certainly better to get a milkshake in the face than acid or a brick, given Jo Brand has – without any legal consequences – suggested throwing acid at anyone the Left don’t like, were I a politician and someone threw anything at me, I would violently assume the worst. Sooner or later some screaming blue-haired freak is going to use acid, and then Jo Brand will simper “It’s just a joke!!! And who cares if a literal Nazi gets his face burnt off!” And I’m pretty sure, were right-wingers to throw even mineral water at figures like Obama or Tony Blair, they would be charged with hate crimes and the Guardian would be full of articles about the violent Right and the need for extreme measures against these vile mineral-water-carrying brownshirts.

Starbucks is now promising to pay for sex change surgery for trannies (40% suicide rate, post-surgery).

George Soros, the billionaire Nazi collaborator, is funding open borders Lefties and of course they don’t wonder why.

Every single big corporation supported Hillary Clinton and was opposed to Brexit. And yet the screaming blue-hairs suddenly forget that Amazon, Google, Burger King aren’t exactly on the side of humanity, and proudly march to purchase their frappuccinos and burgers, in order to more nearly resemble Jo Brand.

Testament to the NPC’s ability to live in the moment, according to whatever they are programmed to believe. I’m not sure if it’s impossible to break their minds, or if they are already broken and so the pieces can be moved effortlessly around at the whim of the elites.

And yet, it occurs to me that if people turn against corporations again, the implicit alliance of big business and anti-white, anti-Western hatred will enable some to turn Right; not many, since to them the Right is evil Hitler Thatcher gassing Ethiopian kids while Bob Geldof wasn’t looking. But because people mostly think in binary either/or terms, if one side of the equation becomes abhorrent, the opposite will become more attractive, or at least less repugnant. After all, many supported Stalin just because they didn’t like Nazi Germany.

And so the thesis, antithesis, synthesis process could result in a mature Right politics and culture of localism, tradition, and a move away from big business and the worship of the market. The Left will be left blue-haired and tattooed, enormously obese & riddled with AIDS, frantically sipping their Starbucks lattes, bowing down to Ronald McDonald and screaming invective against anything white, even swans. It would be one of History’s ironies if a lead figure in this paradigm shift was to be Donald Trump, the billionaire vulgarian, the reality TV star with a taste for gold decor and supermodels, but then who better to know that money can’t buy everything.