the white awakening

Posted on August 25, 2020 by Johannes Q

One of my favourite bloggers is the Z Man, a grumpy 50-something who lives in Baltimore. I especially enjoy his lack of illusions about blacks – in Europe I’m surrounded by people who think evolution has granted the non-white invaders different skin colour to the whites (and bone density, and susceptibility to diseases like malaria, cancer, etc.) but identical brains, and thus they only behave differently because of culture: for the purple-pilled, the fault lies in Islam or the gangster-ghetto subculture typically embraced by e.g. Turks in Germany or Pakistanis in Britain; for the blue-pilled, all the blame can be laid at the feet of the white devil.

I was wondering how the Z Man could be so clear and open about the difference between whites & blacks. It’s not because he’s American, as I know several American conservatives who would sputter with incredulity & indignation if one so much as pointed out differences in IQ between Europeans and sub-Saharan Africans. I know several people who simply claim there is no difference, and handwave away decades of studies, not to mention corroborating evidence such as school results, as a far-right conspiracy; I dare say that even if they could be persuaded that there is a difference, they would say that no one should talk about it, and it must all be the white man’s fault anyway.

So how come the Z Man is so based? I was puzzling over it then remembered he lives in Baltimore. Baltimore is apparently about 62% black. Here are the crime statistics, compared to the US as a whole:

Most whites are not really racially conscious, in contrast to the non-white invaders in Europe, and the blacks in America. As the Z Man wrote once, black identity is formed entirely around their opposition to whites: if whites didn’t exist, blacks would have to invent them. The Muslim invaders in Europe are a little more complex: the less violent Muslims can form an identity as Muslims, and it’s only as one proceeds down the spectrum of violence that you find a Muslim identity which depends upon its hatred of the white Europeans who work & pay taxes to fund the largely welfare-dependent Muslim population.

Identity is formed through opposition to that which you are not. It can be wholly negative, as seems the case with African Americans (judging from across the Atlantic Ocean), a matter of resentment and hatred. It can be positive, as e.g. the sheltered hobbits return to the Shire after Moria, after Mordor, and value its peace & safety as never before.

My guess is that as whites become minorities in Europe and North America, a sense of white identity will become the norm; at present it is mostly only explicit among the skinhead types and intellectuals on the dissident Right – but just as (judging from media) all American blacks have a strong sense of themselves as being black and having been ill-treated by the white devil, so there will be more & more whites who accept that they prefer to be around other whites, that the Pakistanis, Turks, Sudanese, Libyans, Arabs, Somalis, are just not like us and most of them actually want to kill us. From Die Hard 3:

Zeus (another amusing point – American blacks always seem to have the most ridonkolous names) doesn’t hate whites, he just doesn’t want to have anything to do with them, apart from sending his kids to colleges founded by whites, teaching courses created by whites, but hey nothing’s perfect.

White identity, as it already exists, is largely negative, and associated with the early skinhead movements, and of course it often namechecks Hitler and the Nazis. It will be interesting to see if this will influence a future white identity.

My guess is that white identity will become widespread round about the point whites are clearly a minority in the countries their ancestors built; and when it’s clear that the invaders resent & hate the whites. There will most likely come a window of opportunity, as the situation is bad enough to awaken a sense of white identity; but not so bad as to ensure defeat in a military struggle (for at that point, there will no longer be a political solution).

the Intelligence Con

Posted on March 8, 2020 by Johannes Q

They say that con men win the victim’s confidence partly by flattery. I have noticed this with an acquaintance who is both highly gullible and highly paranoid, the paranoia most likely a result of his frequently falling victim to con men; all of his cons involved flattery, the quite primitive con men/women telling him how wise and intelligent and simply great he is – and because he sees himself as a Great Man, he laps it all up.

You could divide today’s official propaganda into two broad sections:

i) The Daily Mail demographic. Here the appeal is to the the no-nonsense white van man mentality.

ii) The Guardian demographic. Here the appeal is to the “educated” and intelligent, the mostly white liberal elite.

I would prefer to read The Daily Mail, in all honesty. The DM has a scatter-shot crudity to it, a simplifying of human motivation and complexity which I take for granted and so find hard to really even notice; the propaganda isn’t aimed at my IQ/education level, so has (I guess) no effect. The Guardian, by contrast, is infuriatingly smug & prissy, and irritates every fibre of my sentience, from which I judge it is targeted at precisely my IQ/education level.

The second sector of propaganda often makes appeal to the self-perceived intellect of the victim. Here’s a good example from The Z Man, though he’s not (I judge) a propagandist, merely one of these “you can’t fool me! everything is in reality very mundane and boring” types:

Stupid people are more prone to believe fantastical explanations for events than smart people. The QAnon stuff, for example, is a clever mocking of the sorts of people inclined to believe such things. It’s a very clever person with too much time on his hands having fun at the expense of those who are not so clever. Dumb people tend to fall for conspiracy theories.

Since people naturally conspire, in every workplace & social group, it doesn’t seem far-fetched to suppose that politicians and the financial elites would do likewise, on a far grander & weirder level than Janice and Sandra bitching about Debra’s skirt at the coffee machine. A reading of Suetonius should prepare one for the possibility that, for example, Bill Clinton visited Jeffrey Epstein’s island on multiple occasions.

The Intelligence Con is to say, “only a dumb person would believe that. It really is incredible what dumb people will believe. You know, a dumb person will believe that goat-riding Satanists decide our interest rates. It really is incredible. Now, a smart person understands that there is no order to anything, that things just happen for no reason. A dumb person doesn’t want to understand this, because he can’t. You’re not dumb, are you?”

Most people don’t care if someone critiques their upper body musculature, but they take it as a personal affront if you suggest their IQ is below, say, 100. Hence, a great deal of propaganda is an Intelligence Con; which may be why I would rather take out a year’s subscription to The Daily Mail than The Guardian.

democracy

Posted on December 24, 2019 by Johannes Q

Great analogy from The Z Man:

Democracy works on the assumption that people work in series. Connect enough of them, no matter their intellectual capacity, and you get enough brain power. In reality, people work in parallel, so the more you connect, the faster dumb ideas flow through society. Democracy is the form of government with the lowest resistance to dumb ideas.

In future years, if the white race survives the boogaloo, books will be written on the fraud of democracy, this incredible idea that “your vote counts”, a system where a few rich (((philanthropists))) like George Soros take control of the political apparatus and use their controlled (mainstream) media to tell the people what to believe. The people have always been ruled by a small elite, but at least in the past matters were relatively clear.

“Democracy” encourages a nation of loud, selfish morons who believe their opinion counts. Because their opinion doesn’t count, they become petulant and full of complaint, and turn to evil.

why I don’t care about organisations

Posted on September 4, 2019 by Johannes Q

From The Z Man:

The exile, in contrast, denied access to the institutions, will place his trust in ideas.

[…]

This is the difference between the dissident and the dispossessed. The former not only accepts his outsider status, but relishes it. Free from the institutions, he can develop his own mental framework as a genuine alternative to the prevailing orthodoxy. The dissident sees his expulsion as the break, the vital break, from the historical and intellectual timeline. Rather than being carried forward by the momentum of his inheritance, he creates a new vision to replace the old.

The dispossessed, in contrast, are haunted by their expulsion. Who they are is defined by their loss of institutional support. They are the bitter ex-wife or the disgruntled former employee. They stand outside, perhaps shouting criticisms, as their identity is an entirely negative one. They relish every slight.

I could define myself a a dispossessed dissident to whom no one pays attention; but I was once merely dispossessed. After leaving university with high qualifications, unable to secure PhD funding or a job, consigned to minimum wage drudgery in officeland, I yearned to return to academia even while criticising its gross corruption & ideology. I still enjoy being in universities and similar, allegedly non-profit-making organisations (certain public sector offices, the military, monasteries, etc.) but I realise I was blessed to be cast out of academia. My ideas, such as they are, are free to develop in near total obscurity. Although several people have gloated that my mind would become “stagnant” without their valuable feedback (hectoring, sneers, etc.), I feel better when I write for no one, accountable to no one.

As a far right-winger, I sometimes contemplate our in-fighting and competing organisations with baffled distaste. I don’t care if X is Eastern Orthodox or Catholic or Protestant, or is married to a woman priest, or is gay, or thinks Trump is stupid, or favours socialism or tribal anarchism or cutthroat capitalism – the main thing which interests me: is he on the side of European culture/civilisation and the white race? If not, I can be at best lukewarm. If so, his taxation model or even support of Israel, are of minor interest. I would rather live in a 99% white nation with ruinous economic policies than a “diverse” modern dump with low taxation and thriving businesses. A ruined economy can be rebuilt by the entrepreneur; a multicultural hellhole, alas, calls for the psychopath and his particular art.

The times are so dark, it should be evidently unimportant to which organisation or faction one belongs; but that there is a naturally fissiparous tendency in men, and perhaps some on the Right are already imagining themselves in a position of power, when the dust has settled; and others are simply of a warlike disposition, and will make war on even their own side, even in the heat of it.

what the Left hate & fear

Posted on July 31, 2019 by Johannes Q

1. One can learn something even from the enemy’s lies & obfuscation. For example, after Trump’s monumental tweet against the AOCs and Ilhan Omars:

he was roundly attacked as a vile racist, for the gorillionth time this month. He is clearly just a civnat, or at least he acts as one – I suspect he browses /pol as do I upon wakening, and is aware of genetic trends in IQ and crime; but he’s too much a believer in the American Myth to start gassing anyone. He strikes me as a man perfectly capable of focussed nastiness against those who betray him, but ultimately quite amiable and a believer in the capitalist ideal, that all groups can cooperate for their mutual benefit.

I am an ethno-nationalist, in that I think genetics are the bedrock from which a working culture (whether nation, or something smaller like a tribe) is established. Civic nationalists are colour blind idealists who think America is a proposition nation, that genetics don’t matter as long as you say you accept the tenets of acceptable behaviour & belief. I find them naive and a little ridiculous but also half-wish their vision were more than a pipe dream.

2. But why do the Left hate the civnats so intensely? After all, a civnat like Styxhexenhammer merely thinks Americans should subscribe to certain cultural values, which I would regard more as the absence of true values: the NAP (Non-Aggression-Principle) etc., and yet he is accused of being a Nazi, far Right, and so on and so on. It’s a little comical, talking to Lefties or even normies: they regard a moderate civic nationalist as literally Hitler. So, at a deeply cucked conference, The Z Man:

Everyone I spoke with at the event talked about themselves as if they were dissidents, dodging the search lights of the man. It’s really weird hearing people talk about how dangerous it is to be a civic nationalist.

I think one reason for the Left’s hate, apart from their inherent hatred, hatred as their founding principle & motive force, is that they have their own agenda – white genocide, Communism (or any totalitarian government), Islam as the only acceptable religion – and even the civnats stand in their way, since the civnats would say “hold on, I don’t care if a genetic group perishes, though obviously I would if pandas or Bengal tigers went extinct, but Communism? Communism?” So sooner or later, the Left would have to deal with the civnats.

3. Another reason: the Left have generally operated through stealth & deceit. They pushed the envelope slowly, always accusing the prescient of entertaining “conspiracy theories”, so when Nigel Farage said the EU wanted its own army, back in 2015, the globohomo Nick Clegg called this “a dangerous fantasy”; and then, in 2017, Guy Verhofstadt called for an EU army. Or, decades ago, stuffy old conservatives in tweed said all this gay rights nonsense would end in faggots diddling our children, the multimillionaire journalists and TV stars scoffed, and then in the late Obama years globohomo websites like Salon began to normalise paedophilia with articles like this, and Facebook ran surveys to determine public acceptance of having sex with children:

Or you have police snipers protecting paedophiles (many with a criminal record) as the deviants are unleashed on small children, with of course their left-wing parents’ full permission:

4. The Left, having rejected all forms of morality (though they love to moralise) have no sense of objective truth; thus, they have no compunctions about lying. When someone like Donald Trump says everyone can be an American, providing he or she obeys the laws and subscribes to vacuous American values of tolerance, the Left don’t think “how quaint”; they think “this is just the first step – in twenty years he’ll be gassing us all!” – because that is their own project: to begin with small compromises & concessions, and end with the genocide of the white race and the destruction of Western civilisation. In their hearts, each Leftist knows that each compromise is but the first step on the path to the gulag and genocide; and so they are unable to credit the naivety and good faith of the civnats.

5. Another oddity of the Left – they wish to ban all content to the Right of Nancy Pelosi as racist sexist homophobic liderally Hitler…? Of course, it is simply what any totalitarian group would do, in a position of supremacy. But when they claim some MK Ultra wind-up toy was “radicalised” by Gab or 4Chan, I suspect they reveal something of their own worldview: they believe anything they are told by mainstream media, and so find it incredible that anyone wouldn’t; and so they assume that if you read e.g. 4Chan you must passively absorb and credit everything thereon. They would themselves find a medium like 4Chan intolerably chaotic & decentralized but they probably imagine it as a kind of Nazi propaganda outlet with Goebbels/Trump issuing commands & edicts to the faithful.

6. This is, I think, why the NPC meme was so vigorously censored on Cabal platforms (FB, Twitter, etc.) – because it is true.

I had several such colleagues. One looked literally like a NPC – on every single one of his thousands of Facebook photos he had the same identical grin, with the same identically dead eyes. He could only do his job if it was 100% by the book and regulated; as soon as anything remotely unexpected happened his system crashed and he would simply refuse to try. He spouted NPC talking points from the New York Times and CNN like “birds fly where they want, why can’t humans live wherever they want? Heh heh heh!” and “Drumpf is attacking the freedom of the press! Drumpf is a dictator!”

Another colleague – with a PhD in English Literature – would calmly assure me of things which were demonstrably untrue, e.g. he claimed Sheriff David Clarke “only supported Drumpft because the Russians fooled him” and “he wears fake medals, he claims he was a Navy Seal and he wasn’t even in the military”. I found it astonishing that someone who had spent a good decade writing a doctorate on English Literature would so confidently assert things which even Snopes acknowledges to be untrue. And all of this colleague’s pontifications were delivered in the same swaggering “look at you fucking bozos, I know what’s what, I’m smart, not like you fucking bozos” manner.

The NPC has no interiority. He cannot evaluate, reflect, weigh up the evidence and opinion and come to his own verdict – because there is no “his”; no “him”; no “he”; no inner mind & conscience: just a receptacle for whatever the Cabal media wish to impart. And so, the NPC assumes anyone who reads e.g. a cucksite like Breitbart must be radicalised. It does not occur to the NPC that one can read something and not necessarily believe it. It does not occur to the NPC that someone can support huh huh Orange Hitler Drumpft huh huh huh without being a West Virginia meth addict with an Aryan Brotherhood tattoo.

For the NPC, any divergent opinions must be censored. As in Neal Stephenson’s Snow Crash, unauthorized code will automatically crash the machine. The NPC requires Cabal authorities to provide the daily talking points (“Orange Man Bad!” “Drumpft racist!”) and he contemplates differing opinion as an existential danger, as an infecting code.

Perhaps the value of Trump is thus: he rewrites the code.

why I am not a Capitalist/Communist

Posted on July 28, 2019 by Johannes Q

I quote from The Z Man:

Bulldozing a church to build a processing center may be a more efficient use of resources, but conservatives always knew the altar was the keystone of civilization, not the factory.

This is why I am at odds with almost my entire so-called civilisation, whether Communist (everyone should have equal money) or Capitalist (the successful should have the most money). Though, having written that I immediately think, I would personally prefer Capitalism.

Capitalism at least leaves a tiny space for the individual. The old adage, that under Communism the poet is executed by the NKVD, and in Capitalism he starves to death in a garret, has an element of truth but really not so much; for one thing, I have somehow survived firstly on the dole, and then as a minimum-wager, since graduating with the highest possible qualifications from an elite university. I have written literally millions of words since then, self-published one book (which only 3 people bought), am nearly ready to self-publish another (which will presumably be as successful as the last), and while I certainly would have been more productive had the State designated me as an official Writer and then given me carte blanche, or had some middle-aged Jewish cat lady publisher decided to offer me a 5-book contract at Penguin, I am nonetheless alive and I am writing.

I live and write in a kind of crony Capitalism where the biggest names are mostly Cabal-approved, e.g. the almost completely talentless & dead-eyed Cabal puppet

“Britain should have no borders! I own 10 mansions and no, I won’t let Somalis live there! Gandalf was gay! Harry Potter was trans! Brexit is literally Hitler! Refugees welcome! But not in my mansions! They should live with the stupid poor people!” JK Rowling. However, I am under no illusions: even without Cabal, my writings would not be popular enough to pay my rent.

At a personal level, the difference between Capitalism and Communism is that under the latter I would by now have perished in a gulag; under the former I am permitted to do minimum wage labour and to have a blog almost no one reads, and to write books almost no one reads. That is, on a personal level Capitalism is merely indifferent to me, my supposed talents and aptitudes and proclivities, and allows me to survive doing the kind of jobs reserved for the utterly uneducated (most of my colleagues), for ex-criminals (some of my colleagues) and for the grossly over-educated & freakish (me). Under Communism, I would be dead and my books would have had one reader – an apparatchik who would write a report justifying my extinction.

On a societal level, Capitalism horseshoes into Communism: both are utterly materialistic philosophies, deeming one person worse off simply because he makes less money. Well, he is financially worse off, but so what? Why should money be sole criterion for an entire society and worldview? Of course, it is useful, since it is totally quantifiable, but I look forward to a future society where mere finance is relegated to its true significance – perhaps to the level of functioning toilets, something desirable and necessary but by no means the central matter of civilisation.

Remainders

Tag Archives: The Z Man