book report: Porterhouse Blue, Tom Sharpe

I’m on an academic-themed novel run at the moment, after Donna Tartt’s Secret History. Tom Sharpe’s Porterhouse Blue is, in its way, as concerned with tradition as Tartt’s novel, but has a totally different tone, one of rambunctious satirical comedy. In short, a Cambridge college, Porterhouse, acquires a new Master, who attempts to modernise affairs much to the chagrin of the old dons and staff.

Like all really good, enduring comedies (e.g. Withnail & I), it’s also about something – in this case, the absurdity of tradition and the absurdity of modernity. In our ghastly modern times, it is fashionable to critique tradition by pointing to its silliness & occasional inhumanities, without admitting modernity’s faults (a regulated, inescapable inhumanity, among others). Much of the novel is seen through the eyes of Skullion, a loyal college servant who has overseen decades of tradition.

He went back into the Porter’s Lodge and sat down again with his pipe. Around him the paraphernalia of his office, the old wooden clock, the counter, the rows of pigeonholes, the keyboard and the blackboard with ‘Message for Dr Messmer’ scrawled on it, were reassuring relics of his tenure and reminders that he was still needed. For forty-five years Skullion had sat in the Lodge watching over the comings and goings of Porterhouse until it seemed he was as much a part of the College as the carved heraldic beasts on the tower above. A lifetime of little duties easily attended to while the world outside stormed by in a maelstrom of change had bred in Skullion a devotion to the changelessness of Porterhouse traditions. When he’d first come there’d been an Empire, the greatest Empire that the world had known, a Navy, the greatest Navy in the world, fifteen battleships, seventy cruisers, two hundred destroyers, and Skullion had been a keyboard sentry on the Nelson with her three for’ard turrets and her arse cut off to meet the terms of some damn treaty. And now there was nothing left of that. Only Porterhouse was still the same. Porterhouse and Skullion, relics of an old tradition. As for the intellectual life of the College, Skullion neither knew nor cared about it. It was as incomprehensible to him as the rigmarole of a Latin mass to some illiterate peasant. They could say or think what they liked. It was the men he worshipped, some at least and fewer these days, their habits and the trappings he associated with that old assurance. The Dean’s ‘Good morning, Skullion’, Dr Huntley’s silk shirts, the Chaplain’s evening stroll around the Fellows’ Garden, Mr Lyons’ music evening every Friday, the weekly parcel from the Institute for Dr Baxter. Chapel, Hall, the Feast, the meeting of the College Council, all these occasions like internal seasons marked the calendar of Skullion’s life and all the time he looked for that assurance that had once been the hallmark of a gentleman.

When I think over the past, and what I miss, it is of course the architecture, the ethos of the old scholars (now mostly dead or retired or fired, to make way for the fashionable new academic), but also the people, the type. It once made sense to talk of a “gentleman”, of a man who acts according to a higher standard where it counts. Today, were one to say a coarse TV presenter or a traitor like Tony Blair is “not a gentleman” people would simply jeer. The notion of being a gentleman has been replaced by being a good SJW, a shrieking blue hair with BPD, or a smirking Blairite bureaucrat parroting the latest buzzwords (tolerance, respect, diversity, etc.)

Now sitting there with the gas fire hissing before him he searched his mind for what it was those old men signified. It wasn’t that they were clever. Some were, but half were stupid, more stupid than the young men coming up these days. Money? Some had a lot and others hadn’t. That wasn’t what had made the difference. To him at least. […] He spat into the fire affectionately and remembered an argument he’d had once with a young pup in a pub who’d heard him going on about the good old days.

‘What gentlemen?’ the lad had said. ‘A lot of rich bastards with nothing between their ears who just exploited you.’

And Skullion had put down his pint and said, ‘A gentleman stood for something. It wasn’t what he was. It was what he knew he ought to be. And that’s something you will never know.’ Not what they were but what they ought to be, like some old battle standard that you followed because it was a symbol of the best. A ragged tattered piece of cloth that stood for something and gave you confidence and something to fight for.

It’s not that the past was perfect, merely that the flipside of pointless snobbery was a reverence for the things that really mattered. And there is something endearing about the snobbery; for example reading this passage in 2020, where every grubby polytechnic calls itself a university, is an amusing experience – it concerns a research graduate called Zipser, with an undergraduate degree from Durham:

The Porter seemed to regard him as an interloper, and lavished a wealth of invective on him normally reserved for tradesmen. Zipser’s attempts to mollify him by explaining that Durham was a university and that there had been a Durham College in Oxford in 1380 had failed hopelessly. If anything, the mention of Oxford had increased Skullion’s antipathy.

I rather like a world where the University of Durham is regarded as a made-up institution. That’s snobbery done right. Even at my alma mater, which was not Cambridge, there was a pleasant sense of being excluded, by not having gone to one of the very best public schools, not having a Norman family tree, and so on. For me, it was somewhat like going to the theatre and knowing that I would always be in the audience, observing the curious ceremonies of those on stage:

‘Crumpets,’ said the Chaplain scurrying out of the bathroom. ‘Just the thing. You toast them.’ He speared a crumpet on the end of a toasting-fork and thrust the fork into Zipser’s hand. Zipser poked the crumpet at the fire tentatively and felt once again that dissociation from reality that seemed so much a part of life in Cambridge. It was as if everyone in the College sought to parody himself, as if a parody of a parody could become itself a new reality.

Of course all this has been undone now, and the parodic old dons have been replaced by parodic SJW blue hairs and their ilk. For example, the University of Durham’s website is full of such multicultural wonders:

No commentary required.

a further milestone in the Great Reset

I don’t know if we will actually arrive at this point, or whether people will rise up & overthrow their rulers in time, but I believe the Cabal have various “milestones” in their project for our enslavement, also known as “the Great Reset”; one of them, I believe, is the extermination of our pets, especially our dogs. 

Partly, it’s because even small dogs can protect their owners, and part of the progressive utopia is a state of anarcho-tyranny, where you’re liable to be murdered by colourful people from distant lands who have come to enrich your culture, and there’s absolutely nothing you can do about it; and also, the security services can arrest you at any time, again without you being able to do anything about it. So the Cabal plan involves having all our dogs put down, in the same way they’ve been trying to take guns away from Americans for decades now.

There’s also a psychological/spiritual aspect: people like this:

want you to be unhappy, isolated, alone. They already have all the money they would ever need; the only thing left for them is to thrust you down into the dirt, so they can contemplate your suffering from their own luxury & comfort. Quoth Tertullian, one of the delights of the blessed in Heaven will be to admire the torments of the damned in Hell.

Part of the progressive dream is to have a small elite who live in luxury, and contemplate our sufferings as entertainment. They want us to suffer and be alone, and to lack any ordinary human connection & affection (after all, if they cannot feel affection, why should we?). People like Angela Merkel are, to put it mildly, not dog-lovers.

Our progressive elites certainly will not allow us to have dogs, for then we might cultivate some small corner of our souls, having something to love and care for. 

The first signs will, I guess, be:

1. Scientists and journalists report that Covid-19, the deadliest plague to ever hit this planet, can jump from species to species, and dog-owners should take especial precautions.

2. Reports by mainstream outlets (CNN, BBC, etc.) of dog-owners who caught a new strain of Covid from their dogs, and died horribly.

3. Green spokespeople reluctantly agreeing that for the good of the planet, pets should not be permitted any longer.

4. Various fashionable intellectuals write articles musing on the barbarity of owning a pet in the first place; angry blacks say that “white devil wanna own dem dog like dey owned us!”, and soon to have a dog will be on a par with owning a Confederate flag, a Waffen SS uniform, a signed copy of Mein Kampf.

And then the busybodies will be encouraged to call a government hotline to report on anyone they see with a dog. Special security services will drive around grabbing or outright killing dogs, for the good of humanity, for the good of the planet, and the same people who will now call you a “science denier” and “dangerous” if you so much as query the Cabal propaganda will say you’re a terrorist for not wanting your dog to be killed. After all, they’re not going to beat your dog to death, at least not unless it resists – no, they will give it a nice quick lethal injection, and then toss the carcass into an incinerator. And if you don’t like it, well, you know who else liked dogs? That’s right, Adolf Hitler.

the human drama of Trump

When they make the Q film, or better yet long-form TV series, the evolution of Donald J Trump should not be overlooked. He strikes me as a man who has long been accustomed to wearing a mask before others, and yet I feel aspects of his humanity emerge clearly, in little moments. My guess is that he really was a (relatively harmless) narcissist until perhaps around 2012/3, when he became aware of what Q has called “the 16-year plan” to destroy America; I suspect that someone from Q team approached him between about December 2012 and 2014, and read him into the full horror: warmongering, 9/11, paedophilia, Satanic worship. 

I always kind of liked Trump, even when I just thought he was an amusing crass vulgarian. In recent years he has developed and become oddly loveable; I get the feeling that whereas his 2015/6 motivations may have been rather cold & distant & grand – to save America, to go down in history as the greatest President of the 20th Century – he was then surprisingly touched by the real outpouring of affection so many have for him. His rally audiences have taken to chanting “we love you!”, which I think takes him aback a little, as the hardbitten New York business mogul; so this amusing moment, from October 2020:

And just a few days ago, December 2020 in Georgia:

After he says – at 24:00 “and we won Georgia, just so you understand” and then his voice breaks slightly as he says “and we won Florida”, and then at 24:14 as the crowd are all chanting “we love you” you can hear his voice begin to break in earnest at about 24:13-14 as he manages “thank you very much” and twists away and grins briefly as if to resume one of his habitual masks.

I find it touching that as he contemplates the largely white lower classes – often fat, badly-dressed, badly-educated, but decent people – the New York billionaire, formerly the friend of oligarchs and trillionaires and coastal elites – realises “these are the people I’m fighting for.”

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tx7D52ewUy4

I guess I’ve always been sheltered and special. I just wanna be anonymous like everybody else, do my share for my country. Live up to what Grandpa did in the first war, and Dad did in the second. Well, here I am, anonymous all right, with guys nobody really cares about. They come from the end of the line, most of them, small towns you never heard of. Pulaski, Tennessee. Brandon, Mississippi. Pork Bend, Utah. Wampum, Pennsylvania. Two years’ high school’s about it. Maybe if they’re lucky, a job waiting for them back in a factory. But most of them got nothing. They’re poor. They’re the unwanted. Yet they’re fighting for our society and our freedom. It’s weird, isn’t it? At the bottom of the barrel, and they know it. Maybe that’s why they call themselves ‘grunts’, cos a grunt can take it, can take anything. They’re the best I’ve ever seen, Grandma. The heart and soul.

a Christmas flashmob

Flashmobs are a good picture of societal dynamics: it takes courage to be the first to sing; note how the normies stare at the first singer with gaping contempt and incredulity, and are about to throw rotten Gregg’s pasties at her when the second singer stands and joins in, and then quickly the normies are seemingly outnumbered by the singers. Similarly, any great coherent societal movement takes great courage at the onset – one will inevitably look like a freak – but then comes a tipping point where the normies realise they are, if not in the minority, at least witness to something significant, something from which their ignorance excludes them.

the Beard of Dorsey

Many have wondered at Jack Dorsey’s transformation. He went from this bright-eyed young chap, the kind of smart young man any father would like to marry his daughter off to:

to a forlorn hobo who Hunter Biden might buy crack from, in a multistorey car park after midnight:

in just a few short years.

After lengthy research, I have discovered the cause of his Beard. It’s actually quite simple: Twitter is energetically committed to censoring and shadow-banning, usually via AI; however Q has protected Donald Trump’s account from all AI intervention, and so when Twitter decides to delete, let’s say 50% of the “likes” from Trump’s tweets, Jack Dorsey has to personally click on the Tweet, go into Twitter’s admin panel and then click “delete”, fill in a captcha that Q inserted just to vex him, and then click “confirm”. Due to Twitter’s internal security procedures, it is not possible for anyone except Jack Dorsey to perform this operation. And because Trump gets a lot of love, that means Dorsey spends a lot of time in his office, peeing in a bucket and filling in captchas. He doesn’t have time to shower or change his clothes, let alone shave.

Hence the beard.

book report: Last Call, by Tim Powers

My first Tim Powers book was the great Declare. I like European history and spy thrillers and Fantasy, so for me Declare was like Alan Furst’s Dark Star, impregnated by The Dark is Rising. Alas, everything else of his I’ve read has been interesting & well-written, but unengaging – at least for me.

Last Call is one of the unengaging reads, for me. As far as I could tell, it’s about a guy who lost his soul in a poker game, to his father, who blinded him with a Tarot card when he was a small boy, and now he’s in Las Vegas with a Greek neighbour who has a huge moustache, and his sister, who is also Isis, trying to do something to play poker with his father again, and win this time. It’s occasionally difficult to follow, as the father figure has several identities so I often thought “who is this, again?” and also I found it a big of a slog so read it in pieces over several weeks, forgetting parts of the plot en route.

It is however well-reviewed elsewhere, and not a bad book by any means. I like this kind of magic realism, where instead of an outright Fantasy world of dragons & whatnot, you have the modern world in all its mundane grime & absurdity, overlaid with strange magics. In this, it resembles Twin Peaks, the last season of which was also partly set in Las Vegas. Powers is good at this, e.g. the edifices of gambling:

Leon had suspected for years that the mannequins in the built-to-be-bombed houses out at Yucca Flats in the 1950s had been, unknown even to the technicians who had set them up, sacrifices to the gods of chaos that were about to be invoked by the detonation of the atomic bomb, and it had seemed to him, too, that the multitude of statues around Las Vegas, from the stone Arabs in front of the Sahara on the Strip to the towering figure of Vegas Vic over the Pioneer Club on Fremont Street, exposed constantly to the sun and the rain, were offerings to the random patterns of the weather, another manifestation of the chaos gods. Chaos and randomness, after all, in the form of gambling, were the patron saints of the city, and had to be appeased.

I found the characters utterly uninteresting, flat, American and kind of pointless, but I suspect that’s just a personal reaction. As I get older my tastes become narrower & more violent. I’ll probably try at least one other Powers novel, in case it captures some of Declare’s, well, power.